>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> Finally its Begun
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2006-01-13 19:06:32, JN wrote:
you want a 'womanizing' president who is having SEX in the 'oral office' . . . back:???: We had one here before, only lasted for 2 years (should be 6 years), he was 'impeached' . . . Since 'cloning' is already in the works, I would choose WASHINGTON or LINCOLN to be re-instated !
Yes having sex in the oral office as you say is still better than going to murder thousands of people in a foreign country don't you think??
Good on clinton for shagging that Monica girl...shows how down to earth and normal he is..
--
Posted: 2006-01-13 19:15:42
Edit :
Quote
H m m m . . . if so, maybe we can put back Lyndon Johnson too
to solve the JFK mystery . . . once and for all !
--
Posted: 2006-01-13 19:20:55
Edit :
Quote
@ axxar if you killed bush most people would call you a hero
the reason 240932823y8 - whatever your name is the reason tou dont hear about it is because the media makes america and its leader look good its called mediation - i am a media student so i know about this
also I say yeh clinton was good, and who cares if he had sex (any kind)with monica lewinski - she was pretty hot and lets be honnest if you were him i bet you would have done the same
--
Posted: 2006-01-13 20:49:35
Edit :
Quote
@luke - NOPE! If I were Clinton then . . . I would rather had SEX with Heather Graham or Lindsay Lohan . . . . in PRIVATE !!!! Though I would ask FIRST permission from Hillary so she would not be surprised if a paparazzi would have some photos of me with the girls - together
--
Posted: 2006-01-13 20:59:38
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-01-13 18:57:56, axxxr wrote:
You may have not been reading the newspapers or reading internet chat rooms about how Sick people have become of Bush...does'nt mean to say nothing is going on..quietly even in your congress members are getting fed up with bush's lies and and the situation in Iraq..
Is this anything new? No. People have been criticising Bush and saying how he would be bad for America ever since he first became President. Most people, including his supporters, know that there are people who are fed up with him, it really isn't anything new. I am quite sure that thoughts of impeachment have also be bandied around before now too, but like ADT I would have doubts over whether or not that will actually happen. To impeach Bush there would need to be some concrete evidence of wrongdoing that couldn't easily be buried or have attention diverted away from it. Merely considering Bush to be a bad president isn't enough.
Quote:
Bush alone is destroying the whole image of America,
No he's not. Bush is a figurehead of a movement, Bush himself is actually relatively moderate when compared to some of the people who are on the far right of American politics. Bush of course is right-wing and has policies, which many in America and around the world disagree with, but to single him out as being the absolute cause of dissatisfaction in America and around the world is a gross over simplification of the matter. There are many people besides Bush who push for policies and legislation that can be said to give America a bad name.
Of course all this is subjective of course because there are people who who consider Bush to be a good president. As much as you are entitled to view him as being a bad president they are equally entitled to view him as a good president. Equally they are entitled to see their other elected officials as being either good or bad for the country and they have the opportunity to vote them in or out of office.
Quote:
it was'nt very good to begin with but he alone has made it much worse in the world...
Again no he hasn't. America was actually held in extremely high regard around the world following WWII and its cultural impact rose accordingly. There has been a noticeable decline in America's world standing with regards to some countries since then, but America's standing has also risen in other parts of the world. Western Europe, for example, has become more critical of America and vice versa whilst America has been viewed in a better light in Eastern Europe since the fall of communism.
America's standing the Middle East was falling long before Bush came to power with such incidents as the overthrow of the Shah of Iran and the conflict in Lebanon in the 80s.
A country can be expected to look out for its best interests and the best interests of its people. It would be wonderful if nations and governments were 100% altruistic, but the reality of the situation is they are not.
Quote:
We have every right to talk against him,he's policys are affecting everyone in the world..our soildiers are dieing in Iraq because of your pathetic president...We have suffered Terrorist attacks because of your Presidents policys..so don't tell us to stick to our affairs..
Our soldiers are dying because of our Prime Minister's policy. Britain did not have to go to war in Iraq alongside America, but our government choose to do so. Simiarly terrorist attacks against Britain are as much a consequence of our own opposition to Al Qaeda as they are our support of American policies. Indonesia suffered an attack on Bali and Indonesia hasn't committed troops to Iraq like Britain nor has it been as closely affiliated with America as Britain. The attack on the British consulate and HSBC in Turkey was in a country which hasn't committed troops to US led conflicts in the War On Terror nor has it been as vocal a supporter of America as Britain. The terrorist attack on the wedding in Jordan demonstrates that these terrorists are quite willing to target fellow Muslims in Muslim countries.
Quote:
Well im glad you agree that Bush is a joke...Its not a matter of how many posts,its about useing our voices against him...and makeing our oipinions felt,if you don't like my posts all you have to do is to skip them..How do you know that their will be no impeachment?..Maybe not but we can certainly hope and try and push for it...can't we?
Making one's voice heard is one thing, polemicising is another. Why should people skip your posts? Saying that people shouldn't reply to your points, but rather skip over them seems somewat hypcritical when you say that you are entitled to voice your opinion. If someone disagrees with you they are entitled to voice their views.
--
Posted: 2006-01-13 21:30:19
Edit :
Quote
I like it when Scot's reply this LOOONG ! As if I am reading the day's tabloids, first hand !
--
Posted: 2006-01-13 21:48:27
Edit :
Quote
EastCoastStar Posts: > 500
@axxxr i havent heard of this over here yet. Do you think it will be on the news and all??
and...
you all were tlaking abotu clinton and monika... i think that is HIS OWN PERSONAL business... it happens to THOUSANDS of people everyday... its nothing we should hear about. its his life. he deserves a PERSONAL life like the rest of us also.
--
Posted: 2006-01-13 23:46:07
Edit :
Quote
@ecs - Yup ! It's Clinton's personal LIFE but HE was CAUGHT that's what is WRONG with it matey . . . . He lied too
--
Posted: 2006-01-14 00:31:33
Edit :
Quote
Interesting... Though only time will tell if they Impeach the bastard. As to why it hasnt made news in America yet .. No surprise with how the media there is too busy putting out propaganda to the people. Hope they not only Impeach Bush but put him on trial for his crimes. But doubt that will ever happen...
--
Posted: 2006-01-14 02:10:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-01-14 00:31:33, JN wrote:
@ecs - Yup ! It's Clinton's personal LIFE but HE was CAUGHT that's what is WRONG with it matey . . . . He lied too
NO! He broke his marriage vows,thats whats WRONG with it,and as a leader of a country,he should be setting an EXAMPLE!
--
Posted: 2006-01-14 02:22:01
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
