>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Comparision N 3250 & SE K750i camera
Bookmark topic
Illiterate huh ? 1.3mp means
one point three megapixel.
I presume you're joking, nobody is that retarded, surely ?
--
Posted: 2006-02-13 22:09:36
Edit :
Quote
@etaab - Yeah, sure I know the difference between a 1.3 and a 2.0 MP camfone = 'image-sharpness-quality' dude ! I was BASING my opinion on the way I 'saw' the images being uploaded here . . . (S700i/K750i Pics Thread). I know that there's some sort of 'magic' when that cam on the S7 was placed ! Basing again, on the images uploaded here . . . the S7i do OUTBEST the images taken from a W550i considering that both have a 1.3 MP cams . . .
--
Posted: 2006-02-13 22:32:24
Edit :
Quote
But I can't find any other N 3250 pictures for comparision. Anyone has any links?
--
Posted: 2006-02-14 08:36:15
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
the S7i do OUTBEST the images taken from a W550i considering that both have a 1.3 MP cams . . .
that's becouse the S700 has a CCD camera and the W550 has a CMOS one
--
Posted: 2006-02-14 11:02:34
Edit :
Quote
ok here is what i can contribute to this discussion...
ive made some comparison with the said devices...
SETTINGS: indoor, flourescent lights..., no tweaking with the phone's cam.
from a 3250's perspective
(shot 1)
(shot 2)
-----------------------
now from a K750's perspective
(shot 1)
(shot 2)
ive made these series of shots to point out the very a good feature in image devices, and that is "auto-focus". it sez it all.
--
Posted: 2006-02-14 11:18:58
Edit :
Quote
Who said the guy who took pics with K750i , adjusted it to the best settings??
the images took with k750i are grainy.. anyone who has a k750i knows
The images taken with k750i are not grainy unless its in night mode.
As earlier said.. dust on lense is amajor factor for poor quality shots.
..there are just too many settings in K750i and optimal settings does provide a very good picture unlike shown in this link(macro, white balance,fine-normal settings..etc)
--
Posted: 2006-02-14 11:24:48
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
The images taken with k750i are not grainy unless its in night mode.
even in broad daylight? i guess the point here is that.. a 3250 doesnt have too much tweaking on it thats why the results are like that.. so to keep the competition fair and square.. we will not make adjustments to K750. and thus this falls down to one.. auto focus... if we can shut auto-focus off.. then we might call it another name... doh!
--
Posted: 2006-02-14 11:29:53
Edit :
Quote
@rockygali
Great shots, keep them coming (just to admire the quality of K750i camera)
maybe some night shots would make significant difference.
--
Posted: 2006-02-14 12:55:44
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-02-14 11:29:53, rockygali wrote:
Quote:
The images taken with k750i are not grainy unless its in night mode.
i guess the point here is that.. a 3250 doesnt have too much tweaking on it thats why the results are like that..
I never used 3250 and so no idea about its settings but your pics in the earlier posts in this sections cleared all doubts regarding the quality of pics taken by SE K750i . Those pics were excellent.
--
Posted: 2006-02-14 18:27:38
Edit :
Quote
rockygali those results come not only from the autofocus, but even more from the macro mode...k750 macro mode kicks ass, and makes it impossible for the 3250 to obtain those results (because it just canīt focus so near the subjects)
hereīs another example (k750 photo without any editing):
its impossible for the 3250 to get these results
_________________
k750i + hbh 600 + hpm 70
http://pbase.com/ares - photography by ares aka antonioj
[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2006-02-14 18:08 ]
--
Posted: 2006-02-14 19:05:49
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
