>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> Nokia 6280 or K800
Bookmark topic
did I say that?
--
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:07:58
Edit :
Quote
slider is ok, not a big fan of them, but nokia choose the same solution in n80.
--
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:08:38
Edit :
Quote
The truth of the matter is that SE should adopt newer form factors by now. Its badly needed. W850 isnt a phone for everyone and neither is a W900. All their phones for normal usage are clamshells.
Look at the popularity of the V3 and D600
--
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:10:29
Edit :
Quote
But it already has a swivel, a slider and a slim candybar as well as a slew of clams.
Whats left to do? The v3 is for people that don't know any better.
--
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:14:01
Edit :
Quote
never could see the popularity of the v3 or D600, ok V3 was very thin and light which attracted people who used it as a phone only cos the features where pants!
--
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:15:09
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-06-27 16:14:01, goldenface wrote:
But it already has a swivel, a slider and a slim candybar as well as a slew of clams.
Whats left to do? The v3 is for people that don't know any better.
But they are walkman ones. My dad isnt going to be running around with a phone intended for youngsters. He's 55!
--
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:17:07
Edit :
Quote
think its better when the buyer tests both at usage and then decides. our experiences are individual on every area, i used 6280, it was accepteable. k800 is not interesting for me, netx to the 3.2 mp cam nothing special to offer after the former models, imo.
--
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:18:37
Edit :
Quote
Oh I dunno, stick a bit of jive bunny on there he might enjoy it (sorry Jive bunny was the only thing that i could think of lol)
--
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:19:18
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-06-27 16:18:37, BobaFett wrote:
think its better when the buyer tests both at usage and then decides. our experiences are individual on every area, i used 6280, it was accepteable. k800 is not interesting for me, netx to the 3.2 mp cam nothing special to offer after the former models, imo.
Agreed. k700>k750>k800
The only emphasis was on the camera, and not on the phone it self. And k800 better have good built quality
--
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:20:52
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-06-27 16:18:37, BobaFett wrote:
think its better when the buyer tests both at usage and then decides. our experiences are individual on every area, i used 6280, it was accepteable. k800 is not interesting for me, netx to the 3.2 mp cam nothing special to offer after the former models, imo.
Sounds like your awaiting the next evolutionary leap in mobile phones, although you have a cam, media player, wifi etc etc... apart from streaming tv what else can you think of thats gonna take phones to the next level?
until that time, you can only improve on existing models.
--
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:22:10
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
