>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Why is K800 low in price?
Bookmark topic
Why tons of ppl being sour here?
K800 is a really a good phone. It improved ALOT from K750
Listen to K800's speaker and then K750, oh my, the difference is HUGE! Picture taking, K750 did a great job and K800 is simply better.
For apperance, well that depends on personal taste.
K800 is a great phone, enough said
--
Posted: 2006-07-13 23:36:15
Edit :
Quote
It seems like the price range of the
's - K series does not differ much from each other during it's initial release (price) : K700/ K750 and the K800 . . .
--
Posted: 2006-07-14 01:36:38
Edit :
Quote
The k800 would be an ok phone, but it's still got a snide joystick.
This message was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2006-07-14 01:55:43
Edit :
Quote
I really did not like very much the K800...I personally dont like the design but I really prfer the walkman series I really love my w800 and i am not even thinking on a change
--
Posted: 2006-07-14 05:28:18
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-07-14 05:28:18, nalbagli wrote:
I really did not like very much the K800...I personally dont like the design but I really prfer the walkman series I really love my w800 and i am not even thinking on a change
Dude, that is just you. W800 is for sure not as good as K800. I can't bear with W800's small and suckie screen, comparing to K800, it is really crappy. Also, W800 doesn't have a real flash and only has a 2.0mp camera. Totally beaten.
The only thing better on W800 is the lens cover. At least i think so.
The only reason you don't like K800 should be the look. Come on, buddy, inside matters, too!
--
Posted: 2006-07-14 09:34:48
Edit :
Quote
both the k800i & the m600i are cheap because of the horribly cheap build quality of the phones...i have both these lemons & i so regret it.
--
Posted: 2006-07-14 11:21:32
Edit :
Quote
A point everyone seems to be completely missing is this.
K series handsets have always been aimed at the masses. They carry high price tags when first released, but after a small amount of time they're dropped in price to something more suitable for the target consumer.
I dont have any hard facts to hand, but generally the most popular SE handsets you'll see in the hands of the public in the street are K series phones (or their Walkman alternative). The K series are common as muck, the slags of the SE company..
Thats one reason im considering not buying one, because even though i might pay through the nose to get one early in its life, within a month or two everyone will have one for half the price i paid and it wont feel as exlusive anymore.
_________________
http://www.werenotafraid.com[ This Message was edited by: etaab on 2006-07-14 10:50 ]
--
Posted: 2006-07-14 11:49:53
Edit :
Quote
just sell them on ebay or here then smartphone.
--
Posted: 2006-07-14 12:13:32
Edit :
Quote
I'm not entirely convinced about the long term reliability of the lens cover on the K800 (time will tell how many of these start to open/close by themselves), but having had a W950 and M600 to test (and these were prototypes), I fail to see where you think they're cheaply built! They're solid as a rock!
--
Posted: 2006-07-17 11:16:48
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-07-14 11:21:32, smartph0ne wrote:
both the k800i & the m600i are cheap because of the horribly cheap build quality of the phones...i have both these lemons & i so regret it.
Thats the first I have heard!
--
Posted: 2006-07-17 11:21:30
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
