>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Sony K800i mp3 player
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2006-08-05 22:22:09, dotsis wrote:
iori37, stop chatting shit.p sries phones piss all over any walkman branded phone audio wise.
This message was posted from a P910
Sorry but I'm sure you are wrong. Many listeners (including myself) have reported the W800/K750 audio to be as good as the ipod and decent mp3 players, so I hardly think it's going to be any worse than the P910 (probably better). There is a small issue with volume (not quality) on the K800. There is no megabase, and that is no disadvantage IMHO. You can play with the equaliser if you want more base, which will also boost the volume (for those that aren't happy unless their ears are hurting).
On the K750 and W800 R1BC or later audio level is good, and I suspect also the W900. Also, there is no quality difference between Walkman and Non-walkman phones per se. For example the K750 and W800 run identical hardware and have identical audio quality.
What the non-walkman phones miss out on is not audio quality, but the lack of the fancy media player features that are available on the walkman models (example better playlist management). Audio quality itself is just as good from one SE phone to the next (current models).
--
Posted: 2006-08-06 06:16:11
Edit :
Quote
It would appear that SE, Nokia, and the other "al'-in-one" phone manufacturers may have shot themselves in the foot by creating these devices. The more they try to add feature the more complaints arise about their phones not doing this or that or not doing something better than this or that. It is quite easy to believe the marketing hype and forget that first and foremost these are phones. I hardly see anyone commenting about the telephony characteristics of their phones, which is the core function but there are hundreds of posts about media players, camera's, etc... which are secondary features to aid in the selling of the phones.
--
Posted: 2006-08-08 08:47:51
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-08-08 08:47:51, sapporobaby wrote:
It would appear that SE, Nokia, and the other "al'-in-one" phone manufacturers may have shot themselves in the foot by creating these devices. The more they try to add feature the more complaints arise about their phones not doing this or that or not doing something better than this or that. It is quite easy to believe the marketing hype and forget that first and foremost these are phones. I hardly see anyone commenting about the telephony characteristics of their phones, which is the core function but there are hundreds of posts about media players, camera's, etc... which are secondary features to aid in the selling of the phones.
Well, you could also say that the companies themselves might be purposely putting 'glitches/bugs' into their phones so that they can come out with a 'revised' edition of the phone and sell it to the market and make it just as successful.
--
Posted: 2006-08-16 12:47:33
Edit :
Quote
just tweak the equalizer until it fits your need on the bass part
--
Posted: 2006-08-16 13:06:25
Edit :
Quote
Quote:Well, you could also say that the companies themselves might be purposely putting 'glitches/bugs' into their phones so that they can come out with a 'revised' edition of the phone and sell it to the market and make it just as successful.
Can you provide an example of this. I would find it highly suspect that a company would purposely sabotage their product with the hopes that people will not notice and then run out to purchase another "updated" version. Not smart biz sense.
--
Posted: 2006-08-16 13:54:56
Edit :
Quote
Surprisingly not many people notice these glitches, many people who buy phones in general don't do much research before they buy their phones therefore they wouldn't really know much about the phone itself. Also if you think about it there are only 95 thousand people in this forum but large phone companies sell millions per month, so think about how many people don't go onto these forums. Many of these people would include: spoiled teens who get anything they want, relatively rich people, people who don't use the computer and many more. Also some of these 'glitches' aren't really purposely put there, for example it would just cost SE a little more if they wanted to reduce the weight of many of their phones but they would probably save this 'weight reduction' for later when they can't think of anything else to improve on the phones or are stuck with the R&D and need to bring out a new model to keep their sales up. Other similar features would be the Xenon flash on the K800 which hasn't ever shown up on the other phones.
oops i meant 95 thousand people on this forum not 1.6 million.
[ This Message was edited by: Maffu on 2006-08-17 04:41 ]
--
Posted: 2006-08-16 16:05:16
Edit :
Quote
shanespencer Posts: > 500
Quote:
On 2006-08-16 16:05:16, Maffu wrote:
there are only 1.6 million people in this forum
Are you sure there are that many?!!
--
Posted: 2006-08-16 16:09:11
Edit :
Quote
There are 1.6 million *messages*. Only 95000 users (and most of those probably just made 1-2 posts then moved on).
--
Posted: 2006-08-16 16:15:19
Edit :
Quote
Where are you getting your info from. You have made some pretty baseless assumptions. They include: Quote:"Surprisingly not many people notice these glitches, many people who buy phones in general don't do much research before they buy their phones therefore they wouldn't really know much about the phone itself. Please back this up with a fact. You are speaking for a collective without supporting info.
You also said: Quote: Also if you think about it there are only 1.6 million people in this forum but large phone companies sell millions per month, so think about how many people don't go onto these forums. Many of these people would include: spoiled teens who get anything they want, relatively rich people, people who don't use the computer and many more. How about backing this up with a fact as well.
You said: Quote:Also some of these 'glitches' aren't really purposely put there, for example it would just cost SE a little more if they wanted to reduce the weight of many of their phones but they would probably save this 'weight reduction' for later when they can't think of anything else to improve on the phones or are stuck with the R&D and need to bring out a new model to keep their sales up. Do you really believe this? Do you really think that SE is "stuck" when it comes to developing new ideas for phones?
You ended with" Quote:Other similar features would be the Xenon flash on the K800 which hasn't ever shown up on the other phones. What does this have to do with your original post stating that "maybe" these glitches were put into the phones? Your logic is.....well, illogical. Nothing you stated has made any sense nor was it based on anything other than your opinion. I am waiting for your facts to back up and validate your argument.
Thanks in advance.
_________________
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*
-/..../../...//.../../-/.//../...//--./---/../-./--.//-/---//-/...././/-../-
[ This Message was edited by: sapporobaby on 2006-08-16 17:17 ]
--
Posted: 2006-08-16 18:17:11
Edit :
Quote
sapporobaby,
i think he has a point. He´s just using COMMON SENSE. U wouldnt find facts to prove him wrong if u tried to aswell.
--
Posted: 2006-08-16 19:29:02
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
