>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> Clinton smacks Fox News
Bookmark topic
Clinton is number one!
I wish he would be brought back as President.
--
Posted: 2006-09-26 05:50:37
Edit :
Quote
Hmmm... I'm confused axxxr about the point your trying to make.
You've said that Bin Laden is innocent of the 9/11 attacks which he clearly orchestrated, do you think he's guilty of the previous terrorist attacks?
In that video, Clinton vehemently states "I tiried to kill Bin Laden and if I was president now I'd still be trying to kill Bin Laden!"
Was Clinton trying to kill an innocent man? Who do you support - Bin Laden or Clinton?
--
Posted: 2006-09-26 05:58:59
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-26 05:58:59, carkitter wrote:
Hmmm... I'm confused axxxr about the point your trying to make.
You've said that Bin Laden is innocent of the 9/11 attacks which he clearly orchestrated, do you think he's guilty of the previous terrorist attacks?
Bin laden is innocent of the 9/11 attacks thats clear as even the FBI and CIA have openly admitted that they no solid evidence to link him to that particular attack!
How can you say that he clearly ochestrated it..can you prove it?...but think that discussion should be left in the 9/11 thread!
Quote:
On 2006-09-26 05:58:59, carkitter wrote:
In that video, Clinton vehemently states \"I tiried to kill Bin Laden and if I was president now I'd still be trying to kill Bin Laden!\"
Clinton tried to get Bin laden for the attacks on the USS cole and the African Embassy attacks which Bin laden did claim responsibilty for...don't forget all this happened pre-9/11.
Quote:
On 2006-09-26 05:58:59, carkitter wrote:
Was Clinton trying to kill an innocent man? Who do you support - Bin Laden or Clinton?
Bin laden has been associated with much smaller terrorist attacks but he was made the scapgoat and blamed for everything else that went wrong on from then onwards.
You seem to be very confused....Its not a matter of supporting either one....I'm supporting clinton on the basis of the thread topic which you seem to be going off!....Its about right and wrong...its not a sports match where you pick a side!
Making comparisons with Clinton and the Bush administration i think the vast majority of poeple including myself would agree that clinton is the better option although there are many policy issues which i disagreed with in the past Clinton administration.
Now please keep this thread on topic and discuss the interview with FOX ....Bin laden can be discussed in the 9/11 thread!
--
Posted: 2006-09-26 06:14:51
Edit :
Quote
--
Posted: 2006-09-26 06:33:37
Edit :
Quote
i really don't see whats funny in what axxxr said. . . . . . .
--
Posted: 2006-09-26 06:35:00
Edit :
Quote
as george galloway put it, 'have an attention span of more than two weeks'
don't believe everything they say on tv/the news,
I agree Clinton was way better than both the bushes, he made more alliances than ever, the U.S. had a great foreign policy and people respected it, now the U.S. foreign policy is shit, and George W. Bush is a joke to the world, even the republicans make fun of him yet the U.S. administration still seems to screw over the rest of the world to benifit from other people's misery.
Funny how Clinton is still criticized for having an affair/cheating on his spouse (something more than 80% of married americans have), but bush is not criticized for screwing up the U.S. foreign policy, making the nation seem uncredible, he can't even handle domestic situations, look at the mess that happened after Katrina (and is still happening) he even put a spying program on the nation and got away with it, the only thing Bush does is scream terrorists and his approval rating rises, sad...
The thing he has achieved is creating terrorist breeding grounds in Iraq and Afghanistan and gave the world more reason to resent/hate the U.S. , nothing like 9/11 happened during Clinton's term, makes you wonder.
--
Posted: 2006-09-26 06:45:46
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-26 06:45:46, darky wrote:
as george galloway put it, 'have an attention span of more than two weeks'
don't believe everything they say on tv/the news,
I agree Clinton was way better than both the bushes, he made more alliances than ever, the U.S. had a great foreign policy and people respected it, now the U.S. foreign policy is shit, and George W. Bush is a joke to the world, even the republicans make fun of him yet the U.S. administration still seems to screw over the rest of the world to benifit from other people's misery.
Funny how Clinton is still criticized for having an affair/cheating on his spouse (something more than 80% of married americans have), but bush is not criticized for screwing up the U.S. foreign policy, making the nation seem uncredible, he can't even handle domestic situations, look at the mess that happened after Katrina (and is still happening) he even put a spying program on the nation and got away with it, the only thing Bush does is scream terrorists and his approval rating rises, sad...
The thing he has achieved is creating terrorist breeding grounds in Iraq and Afghanistan and gave the world more reason to resent/hate the U.S. , nothing like 9/11 happened during Clinton's term, makes you wonder.
Very well said mate,that pretty much sums it up!
--
Posted: 2006-09-26 06:49:53
Edit :
Quote
Clinton may be a womanizer but he was clearly one of the best Presidents the US ever had, and light years away from the ape that occupyes the seat right now
--
Posted: 2006-09-26 10:57:44
Edit :
Quote
John Stewart on the same subject
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DD80X9CXaw
--
Posted: 2006-09-26 16:53:15
Edit :
Quote
The Clinton/FOX NEWS Interview...an Assessment
WATCH HERE
--
Posted: 2006-09-27 03:09:42
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
