>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Official K550i K550im Discussion - (Li)
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2007-02-06 14:20:31, kristianm wrote:
"Advanced" LED photo light
I wonder what makes it "advanced" . . .
I think it will act the same as the one on the K750i/W900i. It lights up during the Autofocus period and flashes when the picture is taken.
I think the fact that the fastport has no plastic cover has ruined the appearance a bit.
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2007-02-06 13:32 ]
--
Posted: 2007-02-06 14:31:37
Edit :
Quote
I agree, the white one looks great, and I'm not really a fan of white phones! It is a shame they have left the FastPort uncovered, although the amount of people that complained about the K700i and its port cover means SE will never win either way!
Shame this phone is too low-end for me.
--
Posted: 2007-02-06 14:36:58
Edit :
Quote
Technical they are almost the same as the w810. The w810 had to catch both 'business'- and 'walkman'-customers. These are more balanced like the k750-w800 duo. If you want quad band, edge, good camera, ms-stick, but are not looking for the walkman brand, the k550 is an interesting alternative.
Looks good too, seems to be asking for a hand to fit around. I think it will be a huge succes.
--
Posted: 2007-02-06 14:37:34
Edit :
Quote
In fact I've just decided its beautiful
Some clever person mentioned that the reason for the relocation of the fast-port on some handsets was because there might be a tri-pod accessory of some sort coming out. Because when you look at the camera side of the phone the port is on the bottom.
Sort of makes sense to me, however the port on my W900i wasn't very good at holding the cable in so whether it would be strong enough to hold the phone is question altogether.
Does anyone know what version music player this has? if it has
1.0 then its music-playing credentials are as good if not better than my W900i. The camera is probably on equal par too.
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2007-02-06 13:46 ]
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2007-02-06 13:47 ]
--
Posted: 2007-02-06 14:44:06
Edit :
Quote
Here it says quad-band, se-site says tri band?
It will be quite a puzzle to keep technical specifications apart anyways.
It has flight mode! For more than only the music player apparently.
[ This Message was edited by: DeLa on 2007-02-06 13:57 ]
[ This Message was edited by: DeLa on 2007-02-06 14:00 ]
--
Posted: 2007-02-06 14:55:48
Edit :
Quote
OMG, I can't believe I've come back to this thread to look at the phone again! Why oh why couldn't they give it a QVGA screen, it'd be perfect then!
--
Posted: 2007-02-06 15:48:13
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2007-02-06 15:48:13, ~DC:UK~ wrote:
OMG, I can't believe I've come back to this thread to look at the phone again! Why oh why couldn't they give it a QVGA screen, it'd be perfect then!
A 2" QVGA Screen!!!
--
Posted: 2007-02-06 16:50:25
Edit :
Quote
well those pics sealed it for me. this is a nice-looking phone indeed. but they'll have to keep the price down, otherwise, it's really just a K750/w810 with cybershot slapped on
--
Posted: 2007-02-06 17:57:41
Edit :
Quote
The only thing that bothers me about it being a K750 rehash is although it got the Cybershot branding it didn't get any of the imaging features of the K800 and hence the W610 is how I'm going. They could've put BestPic and Image stabalization or one of them. Image stability is a software thing they could've implemented. If this had been last year it would've been ok but now these features aren't new for them to only be in the high end.
--
Posted: 2007-02-06 18:06:25
Edit :
Quote
More Pictures:
http://seclub.ucoz.com/photo/10-1
--
Posted: 2007-02-06 18:57:57
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
