>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> I can't help it.W580 vs Nokia new 5070
Bookmark topic
You should also consider one thing which is main for music devices BATTERY ! SE is da Best in this case u know .. Nokia 5700 the company promised 10 hours of playback But u know its juz on papers .. Its Symbain & ARM11 Processor so Less power[plus im not sure of the Flight Mode] .. with the SE w580 u Can Get @ least 20 Hours of playback music .. so its ur choice after all .
--
Posted: 2007-03-30 23:06:30
Edit :
Quote
I prefer the W580. Nokia is shit!
--
Posted: 2007-03-31 05:57:37
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-03-30 12:02:13, QVGA wrote:
Uhhh....that is the most retarded comparison i've ever seen.
Its suppose to be 5700vs W580/850 and nokia beats the living crap out of both of them.
P.S. Atleast compare music phone to music phone. Duh!
its also retarded to compare a smart phone with a non smart phone!!!
and did you read properly in nokia announcement?
5070 is consider a music phone.
what else can i use to compare ...all those Series 60 phone with Walkman?
don't you think that's not fair as well? of course nokia will beat the crap out of all those walkman...because you are comparing a Series 60 with a normal phone.
Yup in final I am wrong in comparing in this way.
It might make sense W200 with5070.
[ This Message was edited by: c96sthl on 2007-04-01 08:52 ]
--
Posted: 2007-04-01 09:50:37
Edit :
Quote
c96sthl: actually it's more like a non-3G 5700 (5300? then again, it doesnt have a2dp) to the W580. atm the closest you can get to is W850 vs the 5700
i actually like the design of the 5700. W580 for everything else. does anyone know if the 5700 would also have fitness apps, like in the 5500 sport?
--
Posted: 2007-04-01 15:20:15
Edit :
Quote
Its a symbian OS afterall so not a big deal for a sport fitness software u know ..
--
Posted: 2007-04-01 15:23:23
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-04-01 09:50:37, c96sthl wrote:
On 2007-03-30 12:02:13, QVGA wrote:
Uhhh....that is the most retarded comparison i've ever seen.
Its suppose to be 5700vs W580/850 and nokia beats the living crap out of both of them.
P.S. Atleast compare music phone to music phone. Duh!
its also retarded to compare a smart phone with a non smart phone!!!
and did you read properly in nokia announcement?
5070 is consider a music phone.
what else can i use to compare ...all those Series 60 phone with Walkman?
don't you think that's not fair as well? of course nokia will beat the crap out of all those walkman...because you are comparing a Series 60 with a normal phone.
Yup in final I am wrong in comparing in this way.
It might make sense W200 with5070.
[ This Message was edited by: c96sthl on 2007-04-01 08:52 ]
I think you've lost it! 5070 does NOT have a card slot
--
Posted: 2007-04-01 15:25:45
Edit :
Quote
I never said I expect nokia to win
look into all my post...seldom I praise nokia
--
Posted: 2007-04-02 07:40:06
Edit :
Quote
if not mistaken you need the pedometer chip to get the fitness software working
--
Posted: 2007-04-02 07:48:34
Edit :
Quote
This thread is so out of whack
Te 5070 should be compared to the K220, not the W580! And the K220 wins because it looks nicer and is smaller; 'part from that, the 6070 has a bigger screen... not much else. Design is the main focus of the low end market anyway.
And the W580 would be more appropriately put up against the 5300; and well, the W580 wins because it's newer, better specs and is funkier design wise.
The 5700 is in a different class; smart music phone.
--
Posted: 2007-04-02 08:34:52
Edit :
Quote
what can i do to change the topic? I guess originator can change the title right?
if the next mail say comparing to a phone lower than K220 then it show nokia didn't know how to make mid range phone anymore
now i only see super high end or high end or mid to high end...or all those
super low end.
--
Posted: 2007-04-02 10:36:07
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
