>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> What should SE do if they want to be saved?
Bookmark topic
No the t300 is similar to what i described but simply does not have the same build quality of the T68i, and in this day of age , all phones should have Bt, unless you want a budget phone.
--
Posted: 2002-11-24 15:44:00
Edit :
Quote
Yes and the T300 is a budget phone. It's a great little phone for the money but it is still a budget phone. SE is going after that 3310 market with this T300 and so far so good I think for them. T300's are selling real well here with TM USA.
--
Posted: 2002-11-24 17:30:00
Edit :
Quote
Everyone is giving all these suggestions without even the basics...
Ericsson (not SE) would NOT have had a problem if they:
1.) Meet demand.
2.) DECREASE defective phone productions (I think they have a 25% defective phone production)
3.) Speed up the damn menus!
BASIC things could've saved Ericsson from the merger... these basic things could save SE too. Forget promos, forget fancy ads, forget more features... I want an Ericsson phone that works the way it's supposed to.
[ This Message was edited by: jplacson on 2002-11-24 17:06 ]
--
Posted: 2002-11-24 18:04:00
Edit :
Quote
And seriously... I don't like the new SE designs, as sleek as they are... if I wanted Japanese looking phones, I'd have gotten Panasonic or Sony. I miss the Scandanavian designs. Not that I like Nokia's designs any better. They lost ALL sense of design after the 8110 series (all 8xxx phones after don't count since they're just refinements of the original)
Ericsson had the best designs for phones... SE has techie looking phone... not stylish. Kinda anime style. Nothing wrong with that... if the tech market is your ONLY market. Not everyone wants the 'cyberpunk' look.
I feel SE had no right to stamp their name on the T68i since they didn't do anything to it except remove the nice rubber back and give us that stupid SMS alert tone...or lack of it rather (The SW is NOT SE... this was Ericsson's original SW that was just delayed)
--
Posted: 2002-11-24 18:12:00
Edit :
Quote
Yes, the software is just Ericsson's old software that they took out from underneath a pile of clothes in some guys closet and decided to call it new.
If they wanted too, I'm sure they could have fixed a lot of problems already, before the release of the T68i, but they want us to be angry
--
Posted: 2002-11-24 19:10:00
Edit :
Quote
I for one did not like the old /// style. I think the only stylish phone /// ever made was the T68m. And I don't like the new S/O/N/Y style one bit either. I like the P800 of course, but that's only for it's features.
_________________
carpe noctem
[ This Message was edited by: Raven on 2002-11-24 18:15 ]
--
Posted: 2002-11-24 19:12:00
Edit :
Quote
I liked them all
But I still think they could have solved a lot more problems before the T68i release.
--
Posted: 2002-11-24 19:21:00
Edit :
Quote
bring out phones much faster. more bluetooth, maby some new phones whit jogdial. as fast as a T600 maby same buttons only a bit bigger. 4096 colour sceen. 40 or 60 cord polyfonic tones.
--
Posted: 2002-11-24 20:02:00
Edit :
Quote
Church? Yes!
This post was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2002-11-24 20:26:00
Edit :
Quote
chungagoring Posts: > 500
they should have released the t600 with colour screen. i dont understand why it is supposed to be better than t300 (600>300) if it even doesnt have grayscale like t200. just for size? come on... anyway, how likely is that they release a color t600?they designed the screen frame as if the screen could definetly be higher. it would have a \"8210 effect\" on the market.
This post was posted from a T65
--
Posted: 2002-11-24 20:27:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
