>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> which walkman series is worth to buy
Bookmark topic
On 2007-09-01 10:10:36, lazeeboy wrote:
dunno about you guys, but i'm going for the W960 when it comes out. walkman branded, 8GB internal memory, 3mp camera, and with wi-fi too.
_________________
A loaf of bread, a container of milk, and a stick of butter.
[ This Message was edited by: lazeeboy on 2007-09-01 09:12 ]
I'll be going W960i too!
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 12:13:45
Edit :
Quote
if you can still get 1, get a w900i. i wish i could get a brand new w900i, it's the best walkman phone so far...imo. if not get a w810i. if you decide that you aint too keen on the camera part the w300i is a good walkman phone as well & not at all expensive.
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 16:44:41
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-09-01 16:44:41, g00gle wrote:
if you can still get 1, get a w900i. i wish i could get a brand new w900i, it's the best walkman phone so far...imo. if not get a w810i. if you decide that you aint too keen on the camera part the w300i is a good walkman phone as well & not at all expensive.
Yes, the W900 is easily the best Java walkman around.
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 00:16:44
Edit :
Quote
W910 - it'll be my next phone
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 08:54:18
Edit :
Quote
Why do people rave so much about W900? Sure it was great, 3 years ago! Now it offers nothing compared to new W phones other than a seriously bulky body and video recording.
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 10:41:57
Edit :
Quote
@ QVGA
W900 offered a proper Headset with Rewind, Fastforward etc buttons, it has the largest screen out of all the Java Walkmans SO FAR,great loudspeaker and sound throu headphones, it had a brilliant 2MP camera, and video recording that is so far the best in Walkmans,and A YEAR AGO it was still the best
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 11:31:03
Edit :
Quote
@QVGA
Just because the W900 is not slim does not mean it is a bad Walkman phone. It offers a camera (which your W910 sadly lacks), a graphics chip and excellent sound quality. Do we want a PSP interface? No!
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 12:14:29
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-09-02 12:14:29, Alexandra wrote:
@QVGA
Just because the W900 is not slim does not mean it is a bad Walkman phone. It offers a camera (which your W910 sadly lacks), a graphics chip and excellent sound quality. Do we want a PSP interface? No!
W910 lacks a camera? get your facts straight dude.
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 12:39:53
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-09-02 12:39:53, QVGA wrote:
On 2007-09-02 12:14:29, Alexandra wrote:
@QVGA
Just because the W900 is not slim does not mean it is a bad Walkman phone. It offers a camera (which your W910 sadly lacks), a graphics chip and excellent sound quality. Do we want a PSP interface? No!
W910 lacks a camera? get your facts straight dude.
A camera that takes quality pictures which aren't blurry and noisy.
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 12:41:59
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-09-02 12:41:59, Alexandra wrote:
On 2007-09-02 12:39:53, QVGA wrote:
On 2007-09-02 12:14:29, Alexandra wrote:
@QVGA
Just because the W900 is not slim does not mean it is a bad Walkman phone. It offers a camera (which your W910 sadly lacks), a graphics chip and excellent sound quality. Do we want a PSP interface? No!
W910 lacks a camera? get your facts straight dude.
A camera that takes quality pictures which aren't blurry and noisy.
ok, so now a bad camera means no camera?
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 12:42:48
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
