Esato Mobile
General discussions : Other manufacturers : Moto Rizr Z10
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Other manufacturers > Moto Rizr Z10 Bookmark topic
Page <  12345>

Aware Posts: > 500

Actually, it's supposed to be UIQ 3.2......

From here......


--
Posted: 2007-09-30 17:05:10
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500


On 2007-09-30 16:49:54, mo-00786 wrote:
lol qvga always has something negative to say about everything

u a goth?

i wasnt negative towards the phone but i was towards your attitude.
"moto sucks blah blah blah" without even knowing anything about the phone.
--
Posted: 2007-09-30 17:07:13
Edit : Quote

korbindallis Posts: > 500

sorry didnt catch that it was UIQ 3.2 even sweeter

okie i think all you moto haters can eat your words now casue the specs does kick ass ......


GSM850/900/1800/1900, WCDMA, GPRS/EDGE, 3.6 Mbps HSDPA connectivity
Symbian 9.2 OS with UIQ 3.2 UI
3.2 megapixel camera with autofocus, 8x digital zoom, flash and 30 fps QVGA video recording capability
VGA front camera
2.2″ 320×240 QVGA 16M color display
90 MB of built-in memory
microSD memory card slot
Bluetooth A2DP, miniUSB


_________________
P990i, K790i, Motofone F3, HBH-600, Sony cyber-shot T9, Sony PSP & 2GB HighSpeed MSProDuo

[ This Message was edited by: korbindallis on 2007-09-30 16:17 ]
--
Posted: 2007-09-30 17:10:18
Edit : Quote

mo-00786 Posts: 204

oooh sorry people didint read the specs properly.
seems motorola are getting better

but still wouldnt buy it id stick to candybar form phones
and only other company id go for is nokia
--
Posted: 2007-09-30 17:11:08
Edit : Quote

Tsepz_GP Posts: > 500

Did Gsmarena make a mistake with the specs? Cause i see it says Symbian Series 60
--
Posted: 2007-09-30 18:38:28
Edit : Quote

jortiz1200 Posts: 82

its supposed to be uiq,the specs are a bit confusing is it quad band hsdpa??thats what i'd really like to know.
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 04:23:21
Edit : Quote

razec Posts: > 500

UIQ 3.2 is tempting, but as well i would like to see flagship SE cybershots/walkmans powered by UIQ 3.2 and i hope P-series retains the TS version of UIQ


On 2007-09-30 16:38:01, QVGA wrote:
Yeah, i'd like to see a SE fanboy come here and say Z10 sucks and back it up. Truth is that its more advance than any SE out there



so are you saying it's more advanced than K850? or W960?
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 04:35:46
Edit : Quote

Supa_Fly Posts: > 500


On 2007-09-30 16:51:39, GUCCI.011 wrote:
Its runing Symbian s60 Feature Pack-1,and OMAP2420 330mhz chip, its like a s60 clone of the UIQ Z8 ,VERY tempting indeed.



Dude sorry to bust your bubble but they beat hands DOWN! Using their own software & better at it. (well thats arguable).

its UIQ3.1 (make NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT).
Symbian OS 9.2 core
1-Handed NON-TOUCHSCREEN UIQ flava in your EAR!

Motorola 2 years ago consumed the design studio, headquarters & also the coders into their own workshop but same location somewhere in Europe - that of SENDO. Sendo, originally was going to go with M$ OS, but they got burned. Then licensed S60 but only 2 of there phones was S60 and they where BULKY.

Its no doubt UIQ3.1.

Take a look at the UIQ org site, look for non-touchscreen and elements used to navigate and interactive information .... then look youtube videos or press conference of intro of the already on market RIZR Z8 also using UIQ3.1 NON-Touchscreen, then look here for the Z10.
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 04:51:35
Edit : Quote

AbuBasim Posts: > 500

Softpedia says "Symbian OS 9.2, Series 60 v3.1 UI".
Unwired View says "Symbian 9.2 OS with UIQ 3.2 UI".

What if both are wrong?
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 08:38:24
Edit : Quote

dancingfate Posts: > 500


On 2007-10-01 08:38:24, AbuBasim wrote:
Softpedia says "Symbian OS 9.2, Series 60 v3.1 UI".
Unwired View says "Symbian 9.2 OS with UIQ 3.2 UI".

What if both are wrong?


Linux maybe?

BTW, where's Z9?
--
Posted: 2007-10-01 08:52:31
Edit : Quote
Page <  12345>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home