Esato Mobile
General discussions : General : The best thin phone in your opinion?
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > General > The best thin phone in your opinion? Bookmark topic
Page <  123>

razec Posts: > 500


On 2007-11-10 11:25:30, Muhummad-Oli wrote:
Lol so whats you r pick Razec?

I'd go for the W890i, although i still love the W880i.



the one that sounds favored in my words above - the W890 sorry i forgot to said clear what i have prefered

_________________
"Whatever you do today determines what you will be in future, nothing is difficult if you do your part"

Have wish for this christmas? tell ithere

[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2007-11-10 10:35 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 11:31:46
Edit : Quote

aldrinus Posts: > 500

W890 it is for me. I could forgive SE for the lack of AF in its camera
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 11:43:43
Edit : Quote

chowchow Posts: 53

IMO U600 rocks in terms of design/function/price ratio. Truly a fashion+function phone.
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 11:50:31
Edit : Quote

razec Posts: > 500


On 2007-11-10 11:43:43, aldrinus wrote:
W890 it is for me. I could forgive SE for the lack of AF in its camera


if it had Autofocus, it'll be another legend!
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 11:51:44
Edit : Quote

shaliron Posts: > 500

The W890 is the best IMO. Not wide, not 'glossy', and so, so thin. And the design and materials look so premium and very fashionable as well. Not to mention JP-8 looks to fit in very well.

The U700 has questionable build quality IMO; a bit cheap and not as solid as the D900.

And the other Samsung 'ultra thin' candybars are very ugly IMO. Thin, but no style (sorta like anorexic supermodels).
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 13:05:36
Edit : Quote

fatreg Posts: > 500

All about the Moto L7e here..

I love it...

now that's a proper modable UI.. seem editing all the way
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 17:05:40
Edit : Quote

razec Posts: > 500

The arena highlights samsung's AF slim phones while in fact there are slimmer samsungs but have no AF. and QVGA denied to inlude K550, W610, K770, T650 although the four are qualified to the slim competition qualification of at least it should be 14mm thin and below(just like N76 ) SE slim phones for me are better in overall aspects
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 23:04:30
Edit : Quote

*Jojo* Posts: > 500

I'll go with Samsung U700 no doubt !
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 23:36:43
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500


On 2007-11-10 23:04:30, razec wrote:
The arena highlights samsung's AF slim phones while in fact there are slimmer samsungs but have no AF. and QVGA denied to inlude K550, W610, K770, T650 although the four are qualified to the slim competition qualification of at least it should be 14mm thin and below(just like N76 ) SE slim phones for me are better in overall aspects


i didnt because they arnt known for their thinness or werent advertised as thin.
--
Posted: 2007-11-11 08:19:08
Edit : Quote

dancingfate Posts: > 500

My fav are W890 and W880.
--
Posted: 2007-11-11 08:22:19
Edit : Quote
Page <  123>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home