General discussions : Non mobile discussion : 11 Interesting Pictures That Look Photo Shopped But Aren't
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> 11 Interesting Pictures That Look Photo Shopped But Aren't
Bookmark topic
nanu u just ruined the pic, i never thought about any of that cheers ate lol. good call though im going to speak to the guy i got it of now and see where he got it from.
--
Posted: 2008-01-13 14:41:39
Edit :
Quote
Well, 9/11 tower could mean the actual tower itself, ie one of the world trade center towers. It was constructed from 1966 to 1973, so she could have jumped from it after it was built, 1974?
--
Posted: 2008-01-14 10:34:43
Edit :
Quote
with bound feet, she had to be pushed or she fell........ but defo not 9/11 well not 11/09/2001 anyway....
--
Posted: 2008-01-14 10:59:17
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-14 10:34:43, Johnex wrote:
Well, 9/11 tower could mean the actual tower itself, ie one of the world trade center towers. It was constructed from 1966 to 1973, so she could have jumped from it after it was built, 1974?
I also mentioned that in my post!
And the still would still apply why get dragged up in 1920/30's clothing and land on a car of the same period in 1979 for instance!!
Unless of course, due to the height of the Trade Towers pre 2001 she gathered so much momentum during her fall it triggered the flux capacitor in her hand bag and thrust her back in time?
--
Posted: 2008-01-14 18:26:33
Edit :
Quote
Unless of course, due to the height of the Trade Towers pre 2001 she gathered so much momentum during her fall it triggered the flux capacitor in her hand bag and thrust her back in time?
God damn i just wet me self!!
--
Posted: 2008-01-15 08:17:06
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
