Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : N82 vs k850.......(some new good pics [800 x 600])
>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> N82 vs k850.......(some new good pics [800 x 600])
Bookmark topic
think low light/cloudy & the indoor pic with the shoes are better/sharper with k850.
and N82 have little better saturation on some outdoor pics.
ps..the oranges looks horrible with N82 ???????
k850 orange-picture is much sharper & better colors !!!!!
----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
@mib1800...who cares ???
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-17 04:12 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-17 04:18:05
Edit :
Quote
Well for one, FULL size picts comparison would be much better.
N82
http://www.smape.com/image.ph[....]okia/N82/cam/Nokia_N82_021.jpg
K850
http://www.smape.com/image.ph[....]/cam/SonyEricsson_K850_006.JPG
N82
http://www.smape.com/image.ph[....]okia/N82/cam/Nokia_N82_018.jpg
K850
http://www.smape.com/image.ph[....]/cam/SonyEricsson_K850_003.JPG
N82
http://www.smape.com/image.ph[....]okia/N82/cam/Nokia_N82_005.jpg
K850
http://www.smape.com/image.ph[....]/cam/SonyEricsson_K850_028.JPG
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2008-01-17 04:13 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-17 05:13:02
Edit :
Quote
@mib, great comparison.. Only few questions and comments, if you don't mind. What's the point of it if I cannot see on the screen what is actually on the photo? And if you print it out will you make it of that size? I mean, they're side by side, I don't want to laser-slice the hair now, but to be frank both of them are great. Just Nokia has color saturation on default that I do not like. I'm talking only about camera here.
Edit: These photos are point&shoot?
[ This Message was edited by: kenoby on 2008-01-17 04:32 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-17 05:27:40
Edit :
Quote
@plankgatan
You sure know how to exploit the camera functions in the k850i.
I've seen several of your pictures posted in your posts from different threads in this forum and I must admit you take good pictures.
Any tips for a fellow k850ian?
--
Posted: 2008-01-17 05:36:49
Edit :
Quote
He will say you could take all photos in document mode
@ plank, respect, just a teaser.
@mib here are two in macro:
One is low light w flash and second one is low light w/o flash:
I asked you cause detail of the speakerphone (or whatever) is very low. Noise is similar tho
[ This Message was edited by: kenoby on 2008-01-17 05:03 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-17 05:54:06
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-17 05:27:40, kenoby wrote:
@mib, great comparison.. Only few questions and comments, if you don't mind. What's the point of it if I cannot see on the screen what is actually on the photo? And if you print it out will you make it of that size? I mean, they're side by side, I don't want to laser-slice the hair now, but to be frank both of them are great. Just Nokia has color saturation on default that I do not like. I'm talking only about camera here.
Edit: These photos are point&shoot?
[ This Message was edited by: kenoby on 2008-01-17 04:32 ]
Who still prints out photo?
Many people nowadays see their photo on their computer monitor or their big HD screen. And photo shrunken 10 times (like those posted by plank) just doesnt cut it as it barely fills up 1/4 of my 21inch monitor.
When viewed at full resolution, K850 photos obviously suffer from bluring, pinkish tint, chromatic abberations and excessive noise. As it stands now, K850 photos are inferior to N82.
--
Posted: 2008-01-17 06:53:19
Edit :
Quote
the n82 pics seems to be the winner here for me...
--
Posted: 2008-01-17 07:12:57
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-17 06:53:19, mib1800 wrote:
Who still prints out photo?
Got me there alright
When viewed at full resolution, K850 photos obviously suffer from bluring, pinkish tint, chromatic abberations and excessive noise. As it stands now, K850 photos are inferior to N82.
@ mib, It is not that bad. You are being a bit biased
Anyway, there is a chinese saying "People who do not have for an apple will say that apple is not tasty and sweet." So I better close my mouth (lid)
[ This Message was edited by: kenoby on 2008-01-17 06:45 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-17 07:34:55
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-17 06:53:19, mib1800 wrote:
Who still prints out photo?
Many people nowadays see their photo on their computer monitor or their big HD screen. And photo shrunken 10 times (like those posted by plank) just doesnt cut it as it barely fills up 1/4 of my 21inch monitor.
When viewed at full resolution, K850 photos obviously suffer from bluring, pinkish tint, chromatic abberations and excessive noise. As it stands now, K850 photos are inferior to N82.
I do.
Don't know why but recently I just bought the LG Viewty for my dad and it comes with a Canon photo printer. I'm beginning to like the printer so that we can put pictures in the album and just show it to others.
Anyway, I can't see much difference between pictures taken with the K850 and N82 except for the 2nd comparison. The picture taken with the K850 seems to be overexposed, don't you think? But it does give more details on the tree.
[ This Message was edited by: G-Izzat on 2008-01-17 06:47 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-17 07:46:11
Edit :
Quote
dont u think the n82 pics cum out a bit blurry...
i personally feel tht the n82 has poor focussing but better colors
wat say guys??
for the 2np pic..k850 is way better...
--
Posted: 2008-01-17 08:16:32
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
