>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Is K850 Under Powered?
Bookmark topic
On 2008-04-13 18:13:59, technical-expert wrote:
^^^^^^^^
Cool down dude
I think its pretty bad idea to go for the K850i on the first place, When the esato forums have numerous threads and bugs being reported , its not great idea to go head and buy it, just because of faith that Se produced K750i/w800
well actually, thats total crap
how about all the other k850 users who are satisfied with their phone
its only a small amount of users who are having bugs, etc
also, not only SE have bad firmware on new phones. my dad owns a n95 and i can tell ya, im glad to have a SE
--
Posted: 2008-04-13 21:18:20
Edit :
Quote
I heard the w910 is preety fast..
--
Posted: 2008-04-13 21:32:49
Edit :
Quote
w910 is damn slow too... even slower when is connected with a2dp... or when youre playing games and sms arrives... the phone just freezes!
_________________
_________________
feco (+3 , -0)
Leave feedback from your Esato seller here...
http://a-zott.com/AI.aspx[ This Message was edited by: feco on 2008-04-13 20:57 ]
--
Posted: 2008-04-13 21:57:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-04-13 17:31:39, technical-expert wrote:
This has been well known fact that K850i is below average poorly implemented handset with a200 laggy platform, If u see the esato forums, there are many people who switched form K850 to N82 and are very happy with it and overall amazed with the phone.
im one of those happy n82 users lol screw k850, at the price range its nothing but a fame claim lol
--
Posted: 2008-04-13 23:08:20
Edit :
Quote
All of the A200 models are too slow (the W890i is just as bad when it's playing music, and even worse if playing over Bluetooth headphones and/or connected to the Bluetooth watch).
At a recent round table meeting with 3 and Google, SE basically said they needed to reduce power consumption with better 3G chipsets, more efficient screens and increase processor performance.
Of course they didn't explain WHY they needed to improve processor performance, but anyone who has used a K850i, W910i, K660i or W890i will know EXACTLY why!!
(I also fear the C902 is going to be the same)
_________________
Jonathan Morris
Editor, What Mobile magazine - the UK's leading mobile phone magazine
www.whatmobile.net[ This Message was edited by: jmcomms on 2008-04-13 22:20 ]
--
Posted: 2008-04-13 23:19:59
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-04-13 23:19:59, jmcomms wrote:
All of the A200 models are too slow (the W890i is just as bad when it's playing music, and even worse if playing over Bluetooth headphones and/or connected to the Bluetooth watch).
At a recent round table meeting with 3 and Google, SE basically said they needed to reduce power consumption with better 3G chipsets, more efficient screens and increase processor performance.
Of course they didn't explain WHY they needed to improve processor performance, but anyone who has used a K850i, W910i, K660i or W890i will know EXACTLY why!!
(I also fear the C902 is going to be the same)
_________________
Jonathan Morris
Editor, What Mobile magazine - the UK's leading mobile phone magazine
www.whatmobile.net
[ This Message was edited by: jmcomms on 2008-04-13 22:20 ]
This scared me a lot! I was planning on getting c702 or c902 AND w980. But I am having second thoughts now
--
Posted: 2008-04-14 05:56:36
Edit :
Quote
Well guys many seems to have the same attitude like me...
why cant they put in extra memory just in case ???
adding a 64mb wont cost anything...
and another thing i saw is when i updated my firmy it took nealy 4 mb of space from the phone memory ( prev it was 41MB )
Is there a chance we can see a fster UI with further updates or should we have to live with it ???
do u guys want media manager ??? that VERY BUGGY media player V3.0 ???
I think i can have my prev k800 media player with mega bass alone integrated... that will save loads of memory..
i think the real culprit is the media manager..!!1
Who needs a F cking media manger which scans all my folders when i store my songs in MUSIC FOLDER ??? Dumb SH!T Software engineers... Idiots to core...
To Dev : Your media mager is NOT a google spider/crawler which indexes all web sites wherever they are... instead its a buddigiest app or addon ever created...
Just please put in my old media player itself... i can live with it !!!
and why cant u make the basic thing " CALL " function some wht faster???
am i running a vista on a Pentium 3 ???? Idiots
p.s : sorry for the harsh words... i cnt resist...
--
Posted: 2008-04-14 06:31:37
Edit :
Quote
Yes, the media player is poor. If you find the original file manager and view pictures (and video) with that, it's a lot quicker.
Still, it looks a bit like a PSP so it must be good innit!!
--
Posted: 2008-04-14 15:33:43
Edit :
Quote
I have to say that I really like the Media manager now, but the only problem with it is that it is sometimes slow.
--
Posted: 2008-04-14 16:05:06
Edit :
Quote
i didnt say i didnt like the psp style media manager !!!!
just look at KD player .... i recently had a thme which looks perfectly as ipod style interface and another was media player 11 like .. they were awesome ...
ok i will put it like this ....
wht is ther in media manager ( k850 )
1.) accelometer sensitive
2.)psp like .. its just LIKE .. meaning it has the * PSP ICONS * ...
3.)its damn slow.... ( for new se users .. it may appear fast... but for me a peson who had used k750/800/850 now .. this is very damn slow...
4.)When i run music from media manager.... i cant do anything other than it .... it was ntthe case in other phones
i think its better we have some kind os atlezst strip off of media manager so that it speeds up a little and also overall performance....i dont want to sit there with my friends when the crap media manger takes its life time to show me the list of songs....
--
Posted: 2008-04-14 16:58:57
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
