>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K850i vs CANON IXUS 75
Bookmark topic
wooaaah. very VERY good pic (from k850).
k850 (800 x 600)
canon (800 x 600)
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-26 21:37 ]
--
Posted: 2008-04-26 22:32:14
Edit :
Quote
^^ The colors may be similar but it's the noise that will separate the Canon and the K850 by a very wide margin. and there's no point in bragging that K850 can produce image as good as canon if we only refer to shrunked pics.
if it is imobile 902 that we compared with canon then maybe i'll change my first paragraph
--
Posted: 2008-04-27 00:18:42
Edit :
Quote
As long as you print only postcard-sized photos then most camera phones, even those with CMOS sensors, will do just fine. So for this purpose, scaling down the photos is OK as 800x600 will still look good at 4x6". On the other hand, you will never be able to produce good looking blow-ups of the shots that you are really proud of.
--
Posted: 2008-04-27 07:11:53
Edit :
Quote
a "camera phone" is verry different from a "stand-alone camera" and of course, th stand-alone camera always, always, will win over the camera phone.. there is no point of comparing those two.. k850 is out of it's league being compared to a stand-alone camera.. it's just like comparing a cat from a lion..
--
Posted: 2008-04-27 07:52:17
Edit :
Quote
Please let people have the rights to post stuff they want. Dont tell them theyre wrong. Leave them alone. Seriously people here have been flaming to peoples thread saying that the thread is a total mistake. Especially the guy "Prom1"
--
Posted: 2008-04-27 07:55:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-04-27 00:18:42, razec wrote:
^^ The colors may be similar but it's the noise that will separate the Canon and the K850 by a very wide margin. and there's no point in bragging that K850 can produce image as good as canon if we only refer to shrunked pics.
if it is imobile 902 that we compared with canon then maybe i'll change my first paragraph
cant understand why you praise i-mobile ???
i look at some of the pics on the photo section, and im not impressed.(and ive never been)
they looks grainy & kind of blurry, no great colors, no super sharpness.. njjaaaaa. i-mobile can produce awesome night pics, but the rest have never been some special...many of this pics looks quite bad. just see yourself:
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]ke=SAMART&model=i-mobile%20902
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-27 08:21 ]
--
Posted: 2008-04-27 09:17:02
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-04-27 09:17:02, plankgatan wrote:
On 2008-04-27 00:18:42, razec wrote:
^^ The colors may be similar but it's the noise that will separate the Canon and the K850 by a very wide margin. and there's no point in bragging that K850 can produce image as good as canon if we only refer to shrunked pics.
if it is imobile 902 that we compared with canon then maybe i'll change my first paragraph
cant understand why you praise i-mobile ???
i look at some of the pics on the photo section, and im not impressed.(and ive never been)
they looks grainy, blurry, etc, no great colors, no super sharpness.. njjaaaaa. i-mobile can produce awesome night pics, but the rest have never been some special...many of this pics looks really bad. just see yourself:
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]ke=SAMART&model=i-mobile%20902
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-27 08:20 ]
those are all flawless pics.
--
Posted: 2008-04-27 09:20:46
Edit :
Quote
ha ha ha.. flawless. i understand why you like them !
is this flawless (my a##). bad sharpness, grainy, etc. and when i look at them in larger size, ?? hell no. i-mobile have no super-good allround camera.
can show many many more. but why should i ? i have seen enough.
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-27 08:29 ]
--
Posted: 2008-04-27 09:26:30
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-04-27 09:26:30, plankgatan wrote:
ha ha ha.. flawless. i understand why you like them, because of your old k750 who is sooooo best.
is this flawless (my a##). bad sharpness, grainy, etc. and when i look at them in larger size, ?? hell no. i-mobile have no super-good allround camera.
can show many many more. but why should i ? i have seen anough.
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-27 08:28 ]
First of all i dont own a K750. Secondly, are you sure you're not blind? I dont see any grain over there. I've seen more pathetic pics taken from K850. imobile has a better camera, just make peace with that go on with your life. you're comparing a CCD with a minute CMOS crap sensor in K850.
--
Posted: 2008-04-27 09:31:03
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-04-27 09:26:30, plankgatan wrote:
ha ha ha.. flawless. i understand why you like them !
is this flawless (my a##). bad sharpness, grainy, etc. and when i look at them in larger size, ?? hell no. i-mobile have no super-good allround camera.
can show many many more. but why should i ? i have seen enough.
To me this sounds like the ranting of someone jealous...
"bad sharpness, grainy"? And if we compare with your K850 shots? And don't come dragging with your tiny scaled-down shots again! Let's see at full size which one has problems with with poor sharpness and noise!
Full size.
Full size.
Full size.
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-04-27 09:10 ]
--
Posted: 2008-04-27 10:01:28
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
