Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : good pic-quality by W760i
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > good pic-quality by W760i Bookmark topic
Page <  123456>

mariozlp Posts: 368


On 2008-05-23 19:15:28, plankgatan wrote:
G702 ????? which phone is that... he he ( it's beibei)

maybe you mean c702 (or g700).... i really dont think so, not by the pics ive seen. (they should have such quality pic as this w760)

w760 have surprising good sharpness for a phone whithout autofocus (yeah i'm impressed but i dont like much its design, prefer w910, have to see it live)

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 18:17 ]

--
Posted: 2008-05-23 20:08:25
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

@hgautam do you really think i care about QVGA answers ???? a man who never show his own pics, just complaing on everyone else !!!
second, yes, you must blind... autofocus improves not ONLY macro shoots, it improves all pics because it have a different optic, of course it improves "more" on shorter distance, but if you look at the pics its several pics taken in quite short distance... so what do you know about photographing ????

i think they looks really good for a non cybershoot branded phone with no AF, no special optimized camera software (like example K-serie), and so on.

this pics have good colors, good sharpness............

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 19:34 ]

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 19:35 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 20:24:36
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500


On 2008-05-23 20:24:36, plankgatan wrote:
@hgautam do you really think i care about QVGA answers ???? a man who never show his own pics, just complaing on everyone else !!!
second, yes, you must blind... autofocus improves not ONLY macro shoots, it improves all pics because it have a different optic, of course it improves "stronger" on shorter distance, but if you look at the pics its several pics taken in quite short distance... so what do you know about photographing ????

i think they looks really good for a non cybershoot branded phone with no AF, no special optimized camera software (like example K-serie), and so on.

this pics have good colors, good sharpness............

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 19:29 ]

You judgement in picture quality is very poor. You can talk about colors, optics, blah blah but it wont change that fact
Oh, and you know nothing about photography too.
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 20:34:38
Edit : Quote

Mizzle Posts: > 500

plankgatan,

No, I do mean G702. It's yet unannounced, and its camera is also 3 mega pixels and fixed focus, yet it performs much better than anything I have ever seen before in that range, and probably also above.
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 20:35:48
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

qvga, you must be the most boring person on this forum. you dosent know anything about photographing... have you ever post one single pics from you own phone ????


_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 19:40 ]

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 19:42 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 20:37:18
Edit : Quote

hgautam Posts: > 500

@Plank

I am not like QVGA or Bav or you (sorry for naming guys, nothing personal )... I am as much neutral towards SE as I can be and still being a very big SE fanboy... When SE is wrong somewhere, I agree, when they are not, I disagree and vice-versa... Simple as that...

Now as for these pics, the resolution (3MP) helped a lot... The camera sensor and lens are actually quite decent and hence I can see that the pics can be of really good quality... But, it's clear that a lot of smoothness was done as well as over sharpening, which are very less visible due to smaller resolution of the pics you have shown... The colors, contrast and brightness seems well adjusted by the camera driver but I see a slight green tint on the left side of each of these pics... Because of these reasons I can't agree the pictures being stunning... If you can't see that slight green tint then your blind...

[ This Message was edited by: hgautam on 2008-05-23 19:49 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 20:38:19
Edit : Quote

Mizzle Posts: > 500

They do look good though, plank
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 20:40:14
Edit : Quote

QVGA Posts: > 500

Where are you posting these pics from? Post a link
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 20:40:38
Edit : Quote

Fanofmodi Posts: 191

@qvga,

Not surprised by the statement made by the most famous anti SE member of esato. Bye the way every SE sucks for u.
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 20:41:05
Edit : Quote

Yakkaimono Posts: 425

I really don't see how these pics are bad though I don't know much about picture quality but they look really good to me even if resized.
--
Posted: 2008-05-23 20:43:37
Edit : Quote
Page <  123456>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home