>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Sony Ericsson is playing a dirty game with us
Bookmark topic
On 2008-05-29 22:32:54, muffins wrote:
On 2008-05-29 22:28:37, xell wrote:
So what.
What do you mean so what?
If you buy a cyber-shot you expect a Sony camera not samsung.
How would you feel if you bought Ferrari and found out it has a Fiat engine?
Ferrari's do have Fiat engines of sorts as Fiat own Ferrari.
--
Posted: 2008-05-30 14:55:05
Edit :
Quote
What sony ericsson refers to cybershot is nothing but user interface. They screwed the picture quality, but i reckon for SE is all about interface. W760 camera interface like shit. Look at those walkman phones, they all have cool interface, but the sonic experience sux, except for W980 hehe. read the review in gsmarena and you'll know what i mean
--
Posted: 2008-05-30 15:59:34
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-29 22:32:54, muffins wrote:
How would you feel if you bought Ferrari and found out it has a Fiat engine?
Bad analogy. All Ferrari F1 racecars are powered by FIAT.
I buy SE because of the User Interface. The camera, media player and other features are a bonus.
--
Posted: 2008-05-30 16:39:48
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-29 22:31:00, Bonovox wrote:
Well i seriously think most other phone brands are over taking SonyEricsson in camera quality stakes and i dont think Cyber Shot means anything anyway.
I agree.. it really means nothing! CyberShot and Walkman branding is all about MARKETING! Don't expect something good will come out.
On 2008-05-29 22:30:52, number1 wrote:
Don't buy there new cybershots simple, then when se realise they arent selling then maybe there do something about it.
yep! i agree with this... try to advertise people not to buy this product and when SE find their report that c902 is not profitable, then i bet they will do something about it
--
Posted: 2008-05-30 16:50:35
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-05-29 22:32:54, muffins wrote:
On 2008-05-29 22:28:37, xell wrote:
So what.
What do you mean so what?
If you buy a cyber-shot you expect a Sony camera not samsung.
How would you feel if you bought Ferrari and found out it has a Fiat engine?
You didn't expect the quality from a real cyber-shot camera, did you?
That is called marketing
--
Posted: 2008-05-30 20:40:37
Edit :
Quote
they must call it samsung-shot ... bla bla bla-shot ... shit-shot
[ This Message was edited by: BISHOP990 on 2008-05-29 21:25 ]
one more thing: it must be called Cyber - Shit
--
Posted: 2008-05-31 14:48:59
Edit :
Quote
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=152504#post2061688
--
Posted: 2008-06-02 04:35:26
Edit :
Quote
i think sony ericsson phones are overpriced for the features they include...the RRP for SE phones when they come out is ridiculously high considering how most of the phones in the whole SE range pretty much have the same features and not much new stuff.
as for cybershot phones, i think the quality of the camera has gone down since cybershot range was first released =/ nokia now with its carl zeiss lenses>all
(btw strange that sony digital cameras and video cameras use carl zeiss lenses but then for the phones nokia has it :S)
--
Posted: 2008-06-02 15:26:30
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-02 15:26:30, o0AznJ0o wrote:
i think sony ericsson phones are overpriced for the features they include...the RRP for SE phones when they come out is ridiculously high considering how most of the phones in the whole SE range pretty much have the same features and not much new stuff.
as for cybershot phones, i think the quality of the camera has gone down since cybershot range was first released =/ nokia now with its carl zeiss lenses>all
(btw strange that sony digital cameras and video cameras use carl zeiss lenses but then for the phones nokia has it :S)
lol... i don't think its over price because you pay for the brand aright? you pay the brand CYBERSHOT, WALKMAN!!! i hope you get what i mean
and beautiful camera is not thru branded lense OH PLEASE!!! well lense do help but the main factor is still the hardware not the lense aright?
On 2008-05-30 20:40:37, k850 successor wrote:
On 2008-05-29 22:32:54, muffins wrote:
On 2008-05-29 22:28:37, xell wrote:
So what.
What do you mean so what?
If you buy a cyber-shot you expect a Sony camera not samsung.
How would you feel if you bought Ferrari and found out it has a Fiat engine?
You didn't expect the quality from a real cyber-shot camera, did you?
That is called marketing
yep! i didn't...
--
Posted: 2008-06-02 15:38:31
Edit :
Quote
It's funny how some of you defend mediocrity in premium priced devices. I'll tell you straight up that SE design and UI is the only thing that's got me hanging by a thread, or I would've left them in their complacency and self-worship by now. If the majority says SE can slap Cybershot and Walkman brands on their phones without going that extra mile to make it as deserving as they could to dedicated devices' reputation (ie by putting sound chips for Walkman and proper lenses for Cybershot like other manufacturers are doing now), then that thin thread might just snap and I'd be one of those to join the exodus out of SE.
--
Posted: 2008-06-03 02:24:10
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
