>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Post your Pictures/Videos taken by C905
Bookmark topic
On 2008-06-27 09:17:19, Alf Nif wrote:
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!!
Well, you can set the ISO on A200 cyber-shots as well.
--
Posted: 2008-06-27 09:45:37
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-27 09:45:37, NightBlade wrote:
Well, you can set the ISO on A200 cyber-shots as well.
I haven't played with any cybershot phone at all.. My latest phone is the Z610.
Now I gotto find out if I want the G900 or C905.
I think I'd go for design and get the C905...
Sorry, just realised I got off topic
_________________
Alf Nif
formerly known as seiunUsagi
[ This Message was edited by: Alf Nif on 2008-06-27 08:50 ]
--
Posted: 2008-06-27 09:49:14
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-27 09:17:19, Alf Nif wrote:
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone.
You can set ISO and Shutter time on the c905??? I want it even more than before!!
No, I just peeked at the EXIF data on darknoob's photo. I don't own the C905 myself.
Somehow I doubt they will put manual controls on a cell phone.
--
Posted: 2008-06-27 10:54:08
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
In another thread it was concluded the C905 darknoob used is an older prototype (low light pictures taken with newer protos seem to be less grainy).
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Most cybershot phones (at lest the more high-end one) usually have image stabilizer. But nothing fancy as optical or sensor-shifting. Cybershots only lowers the ISO when image stabilizer is enabled to my best knowledge.
--
Posted: 2008-06-27 12:15:42
Edit :
Quote
how u got c905?
--
Posted: 2008-06-27 17:49:31
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-27 17:49:31, pravin_i wrote:
how u got c905?
no-one has. just protos
--
Posted: 2008-06-27 17:57:24
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-27 04:55:53, ch33sehead wrote:
That's pretty grainy for ISO 200, and the picture isn't very sharp. But then again, it was shot at 1/15s, which is usually hit or miss for sharpness. Does this thing have an optical or sensor-shift image stabilizer?
Meh, I think I'll stick to using a real camera. However, that is still pretty darn good for a camera phone.
Look at this sample that I took:
http://www.upit.ws/uploads/8da6fcecdb69a.jpg
http://www.upit.ws/uploads/8b1b3c539e5be.jpg
the details are stunning
[ This Message was edited by: darknoob on 2008-06-27 17:36 ]
--
Posted: 2008-06-27 18:36:31
Edit :
Quote
Like I said, darknoob, it's really good for a cell phone.
However, it is not comparable to a decent compact camera. In fact, I don't believe the quality is better than the K750 or K800. It seems the sensor size remained the same--they just upped the megapixels, which reduces the photosite size.
[ This Message was edited by: ch33sehead on 2008-06-27 22:57 ]
--
Posted: 2008-06-27 23:49:24
Edit :
Quote
Great pictures as usual Plankgatan
I'm very jealous that you get access to a C905, even a proto...
--
Posted: 2008-06-28 11:10:51
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-06-27 23:49:24, ch33sehead wrote:
In fact, I don't believe the quality is better than the K750 or K800.
Have you seen a 2/3 MP pic taken (or shrunk to 2/3 MP) with C905 compared with K750/K800 to determine that ?
On 2008-06-27 23:49:24, ch33sehead wrote:
It seems the sensor size remained the same--they just upped the megapixels, which reduces the photosite size.
If that was the case the noise and loss of details would have increased (probably alot), not decreased (or styed at same level) as is the case now.
--
Posted: 2008-07-01 23:14:35
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
