>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> T300 not a good buy??
Bookmark topic
For me I can rate that as 1 one of d best phne like my r520 :)
This post was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2003-01-05 17:24:00
Edit :
Quote
I'll take B and C!
The T300 is good for that money. No better phone in that segment today. ths s55 is a little better and t68 maybe best, but depends on what you can do without.
T300 and s55 doesnt have syns capabilities for instance.
T300 no calender or BT.
[ This Message was edited by: bjarne1 on 2003-01-05 16:53 ]
--
Posted: 2003-01-05 17:52:00
Edit :
Quote
I think the T68 is the absolutely best phone, but T300 is not a bad phone! It just has a few less features than T68.. But honestly how often do you use BT etc.. The only bad thing about T300 is its ugly design.. Other vise a good buy. (Love my T68)
This post was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-01-05 18:17:00
Edit :
Quote
Looks are down to taste/personal perferance, am I the only person who thinks the nokia 7210 is ugly/over designed?
The t300 is very near spec wise to the t68i, no calendor, no voice dialing and no blutooth, though you can use the dba 10 for headsets.
--
Posted: 2003-01-05 21:15:00
Edit :
Quote
As said, it depends on what you want.
For me it is the best phone, I don't want BT or the calendar functions of the T68 but do want the excellent polyphonic tones and games.
In this respect the T300, at least for my requirements, is the better of the two.
As for Nokia, well... they all look the same to me...
BTW the T300 is not a brick, it's very small, only 5mm longer than a T68
--
Posted: 2003-01-05 21:41:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply