>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> short comparision c902 & c905
Bookmark topic
Guys, I got myself a C905 today and I did own the C902 twice before. I can confirm that the C905 takes slightly SOFTER pics due to the fact that it is tuned to reduce noise as much as possible. The result is MUCH less noise than most cameraphones (particularly the C902) BUT with a slightly SOFTER appearence. One can easily sharpen them with any free photo-editing software like the outstanding Irfanview.
Oltherwise...it much thicker than the C902 but it has a much brighter and larger display which is still not a match for the better 2.4 in. displays by Samsung and Motorola. Compared to the display of the ZN5, the C905 looks less bright and more "washed-out". The materials are also of moderate quality without ANY tiny bit of metal...a U900 or a ZN5 are MUCH better made. Anyway, it has lots of advantages as well like the (crippled) GPS, Wi-Fi, HSDPA and the extremely useful MULTITASKING!
One more thing...I bought it here in Greece for 450 euros after a 10% discount with a coupon. The retail price of 500 euros is rather ridiculous in my opinion for this particular device and for the materials used.
[ This Message was edited by: haki on 2008-11-11 18:18 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-11 19:15:57
Edit :
Quote
Err.. i like the c902 pics better!
--
Posted: 2008-11-11 19:38:26
Edit :
Quote
first picture...auto..(well and macro, other picture)
second....macro
third...macro
ps.....i tried both documnet & macro with c905 just to see, it was no difference at all....(exactley as c902, macro produce same sharpness as document)...
c905 had some issues to get good sharpness, i think thats the biggest improvment a new software should do.
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-11 18:52 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-11 19:38:49
Edit :
Quote
i actually want to see the k850 (with modded camdrivers) vs c905
--
Posted: 2008-11-11 19:42:35
Edit :
Quote
two more pics...really hard to get good quality when you shoot against a window...so its no good
was maybe 5 minutes between the pictures..........
c905
c902
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-11 18:47 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-11 19:47:01
Edit :
Quote
sry, but from your previous post you are the least credible person to comapre anyting to C902.
--
Posted: 2008-11-11 20:08:55
Edit :
Quote
please, you make me cry here...(ok guys i admit, i have super edit all c902 pics and make all c905 pics worse.....you got me there).
lets turn everything to the opposite way...what do you see when you look at c905 thread ???? its obivious c905 suffers of unstable software...
get real and swallow the fact....
both this pictures is shoot with macro
(exactley same settings)...its obivious thats something who make c905 unsharp...
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-11 19:45 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-11 20:25:32
Edit :
Quote
The firmware on the C905 you used is old. There is a newer firmware out now.
--
Posted: 2008-11-11 22:13:32
Edit :
Quote
Planks c902 is always better... Plank compare his c902 with dslr, and c902 is better.
--
Posted: 2008-11-11 23:02:19
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-11-11 22:13:32, dephanix wrote:
The firmware on the C905 you used is old. There is a newer firmware out now.
Plank believes the old firmware is better (which it may be, I don't know), I have the latest firmware on my c902 so if the pics suck I know it will be because I was using the wrong firmware
--
Posted: 2008-11-11 23:28:47
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
