>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Comparison of K790i with K770i
Bookmark topic
On 2008-12-25 10:09:30, AbuBasim wrote:
The K770's camera does not apply much post-processing on the pictures so, although a little noisier than the K790's photos, some people (me! anyone else?) prefer these as they tend to look more natural at full size.
Me too!
--
Posted: 2008-12-25 11:57:47
Edit :
Quote
yep, me too. I like Samsung cameras
--
Posted: 2008-12-25 13:05:13
Edit :
Quote
I agree about Samsung. They have a different approach to noise reduction. They seem to use Gaussian instead of Median filter. This doesn't smudge out the noise in the same way. Where a Nokia or SE camphone kills a lot of detail to get rid of the noise, a low light Samsung camphone photo will instead look a bit blurry. The result looks better.
Here's an comparison between Samsung D900 and SE K800 taken from
M-R's review of the 3 MP camera in the D900:
K800:
Original:
http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]ung/d900/photo/k800i/00558.jpg
D900:
Original:
http://www.mobile-review.com/[....]900/photo/photo2/photo0021.jpg
Only the most stubborn SE fanboi would say that the K800 photo is better.
_________________
Souvenirs, novelties, party tricks.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-12-25 12:49 ]
--
Posted: 2008-12-25 13:35:39
Edit :
Quote
I have both and I can say for certain that that K770i takes better pictures. The colors are MUCH better, and the pictures are far more detailed. The K800 does take slightly sharper images, though that may just be the phone applying some post processing.
Though to be honest, the K800 is a better built phone.
--
Posted: 2008-12-27 23:40:58
Edit :
Quote
wow that was huge diffrence in thos pics
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 01:26:20
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
