Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : is that possible ! C905 - what the hell is wrong with this camera?
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > is that possible ! C905 - what the hell is wrong with this camera? Bookmark topic
Page <  123, ... 91011>

StevenC Posts: > 500

You may get blurry and distorted colour photos if the lens is dirty eg. greasy hands....
--
Posted: 2008-12-27 07:18:53
Edit : Quote

panonski Posts: 345


On 2008-12-27 07:18:53, StevenC wrote:
You may get blurry and distorted colour photos if the lens is dirty eg. greasy hands....


Yes, I would try to think somenthing like that Men U really funny
--
Posted: 2008-12-27 10:34:35
Edit : Quote

Logicbloke Posts: 40

A guy posted a topic complaining about his c905 gps and you about your camera i guess c702 is better

This message was posted from a SGH-C180
--
Posted: 2008-12-27 10:45:26
Edit : Quote

gtr83 Posts: > 500

@panonski

Actually StevenC is right. It happened to me with a C702 when I tried to take a pic after eating some nachos, and some bits of sauce got into the lens - I know it sounds idiotic but it really happened lol.

Still I think I'm getting this phone once its price goes down a bit, I don't care about the picture quality because I know what mobile phone cameras are for. Quick snaps where you don't really need details and photographic skills.
--
Posted: 2008-12-27 10:59:35
Edit : Quote

Sator1973 Posts: 242

I agree with gtr83 and martymcfly. Phone cams are snapshot cams, even if they're 8 MP. If you don't expect too much, the circumstances are right and you have a feeling for photography, then the results might sometimes surprise you in a positive way.
I think C905's biggest problem is the sensor, way too small for 8 MP. But heck, it sells, doesn't it.
If it was only 3 MP, overall quality probably would be better. And how large do you want your prints? Are they gonna be a meter wide? My prints won't.
My desktop screen has 2.3 MP and I'm very satisfied if my phone-photos look good on that.
So panonski, have you tried setting your cam to a lower pixelcount?
--
Posted: 2008-12-27 13:18:51
Edit : Quote

panonski Posts: 345

OK,

NOW I WILL POST some pics from MY K750i























[ This Message was edited by: panonski on 2008-12-27 14:09 ]
--
Posted: 2008-12-27 14:44:13
Edit : Quote

Sator1973 Posts: 242

Yes, those pics are relatively good, and again, because I think the sensor-lense ratio is better in K750 than in C905. C905 has too much pixels for it's sensor. So it needs a very aggresive software for post-processing.
If I want a photo printed 3 feet wide, I'll make sure I shot it with a decently sensored camera.
Well, at least I can shoot very nice close-ups with my C702 and N1's driver, and the other snapshots are nice enough for memories.
I would advise to try some more drivers. N1's driver improves my C702 a lot. It's not bad at all compared to old fashioned analog snapshot cams. Sometimes a bit of noise suits the picture.
http://picasaweb.google.com/l[....]KaX9_hPV-tH0LA?feat=directlink
--
Posted: 2008-12-27 16:40:39
Edit : Quote

gtr83 Posts: > 500

Well you shouldn't have posted K750 photos because we all know how good they are in general conditions. On the flip side, have you seen some samples of C905 pics on its general forum? There are some really good ones. But I wouldn't rely on it for photo quality - it has other functions that suit my needs well although I have to agree that since C905 is marketed as a camera phone, it should make above average pics. But that's the woe of marketing I guess.

Like Sator said, the lens is just too small; it doesn't gather enough light which seems to be the case with all A200 Cyber-shots.
--
Posted: 2008-12-27 17:03:42
Edit : Quote

panonski Posts: 345

I'm very glad that U comments this photos. In fact thisi is the main reason why they are here.

Look carefully, simply cannot resist to compare them with C905.

Victim here in this MOBILe is unfortunately PHOTO quality. Firmware doesn't suit to well
to 8.1 MP, and I certainly hope so, this is not the end. I like photo moments, and I'm good in that. One thing I hate, bring to much with myself.

Camera and phone, suit to me, like fish in the water.


p.s.

Sport Mode - ugliest pic of all of them. Don't shoot with this mode, except on sunny day.

Document Mode - Brightness of all, not bad.

Best results with truly color ( pretty same in real of my space ) I was get from "Fluorescent" , and minimum noise with "Portret in the Dark"


I'm spying on number1, and raiderski, shall they create somethin new, but it seems, they don't have easiest ride to do that this time.

.


p.p.s.

I really don't know where are the simple modes from K750 without this shitty modes for idiots. I must guessing every time what they meaning by

"landscape in the dark".

--
Posted: 2008-12-27 17:41:10
Edit : Quote

amnher Posts: > 500

@ panonski those pics are good from k750i, are those default driver? or modded ones?
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 08:07:40
Edit : Quote
Page <  123, ... 91011>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home