>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> pic quality which one is better t68i or 7650
Bookmark topic
From personal experience (using an MCA-25 camera) the 7650 is better than the t68i. Photos taken using the t68i and t300 are repeatedly grainy with v.bad white balance etc.. but 7650 is nice point and shoot good photos nearly every time. I still love my T68i however, and wouldn't give it away for the world! actually i am for a P800 but there ya go
--
Posted: 2003-01-13 22:17:00
Edit :
Quote
Uhh... disregard this post.
[ This Message was edited by: Coramoor on 2003-01-13 21:23 ]
--
Posted: 2003-01-13 22:22:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2003-01-13 13:36, J2theIZZO wrote:
Where has it been proved that the picture 'quality' of the T68i is better than the 7650?
Here ya go:
http://www.threegmobile.net/gallery/sonyericssont300new/
(MCA-25 vs 7650)
http://www.cellman.it/7650vsMCA20test.htm
(MCA-20 vs 7650)
http://www.ractive.ch/t68/mca20.php?page=1
--
Posted: 2003-01-13 22:23:00
Edit :
Quote
I have tried both of them and the difference is not visable once sent to a computer!!! On the screen the Nokia is better....
--
Posted: 2003-01-14 18:49:00
Edit :
Quote
The above poster got it right, anyone who thinks a pic on the screen of t68i is better than 7650 is insane.............i don`t care because i have p8.
NOTE, all 3 of above are similar viewed on a pc.
--
Posted: 2003-01-14 19:01:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2003-01-14 19:01, pachy wrote:
The above poster got it right, anyone who thinks a pic on the screen of t68i is better than 7650 is insane
Was talking about a computer screen, not the phone's screen.
And actually, once on a PC the 7650 pics look horrid
--
Posted: 2003-01-16 21:41:00
Edit :
Quote
I think the cameras in present mobiles are purely for fun. Like capturing an insanely funny moment or something you weren't exepecting. Like the bear in the nokia commercial(I think that commercial truly captures the meaning of the camera).
None of them are sufficient for family album photos anyway.
I feel the camera on the nokia wins due to the fact that it is attached to the phone. You may not always be dragging the ericsson cam around no matter how small it is.(however the t68i and the camera together is smaller than the 7650)
--
Posted: 2003-01-16 21:49:00
Edit :
Quote
I totally agree that the camera is just for fun and MMS. Everyone who complains about "it's only 640x480" or "why isn't it at least 1.1 megapixels" doesn't understand why the camera was added, and/or is just looking for a cheap digicam.
--
Posted: 2003-01-16 22:38:00
Edit :
Quote
hehe.. It isn't even cheap.
You can get digicams for half the price with twice the amount of pixels...
--
Posted: 2003-01-16 23:16:00
Edit :
Quote
--->
Rashkae
Nokia 7650 is better on ALL ASPECT except the device size
. Ok, here is my opinion (7650 VS T68i+MCA 20)
1). Convenience
T68i:
U must attach first the camera, press the shutter, ADJUST THE SETTING FOR BEST QUALITY BASED ON ILUMINATION CONDITION/ *#*#, UGH!, press the shutter once again, WAIT FOR SUCH A LONG TIME FOR 640X480 RESOLUTION, MOVING THE IMAGE TO PICTURE PHONEBOOK.
Ugh!!!! Such a boring and lame procedure ...
7650:
Move the slide and HERE WE GO!!! Press the joystick--->automatically saving!!!
Done!
2). Pic quality on PHONE DISPLAY
T68i:
- Only darkness is found especially on low light condition
- Blur, less colour and not sharp really (256 color T68i).
7650:
- Bright, true color (almost) and very sharp and detail almost like analog camera result.
- NIGHTSHOT!!!! works well
Kudo Nokia!!!
3). Viewfinder
T68i:
- The worst of the worst!
7650:
- Nearly my JVC mini DV! Awesome!
Kudo Nokia!!!
I can say that because I have T68i+MCA+20, and I will give to my cousin. Now, I am Nokia fans because SE is really dissapointed (Yes, Ericsson is pioneer, rule maker BUT ALWAYS LOSE COMPETITION and can't improve the technology
).
--
Posted: 2003-01-16 23:50:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
