Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Why dont CyberShot phones have Carl Ziess lenses?
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Why dont CyberShot phones have Carl Ziess lenses?
Bookmark topic
I'm going to say this one more time: Nokia's agreement with Carl Zeiss about the so-called Carl Zeiss lenses is nothing but a trademark agreement to say that Nokia's standard lenses have been approved by Carl Zeiss. It has no effect on the outcome whatsoever, and is nothing more than a stupid branding agreement to make customers think that they've got the better optics - and it's obviously working. Any change you might spot in the outcomes of a phone with and without the so-called 'Carl Zeiss optics' is due to a different software post-processing.
On a side note, Carl Zeiss optics are far from the best in the league when it comes to professional grade optics for professional single lens reflex cameras.
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 16:33:50
Edit :
Quote
i think you wrong
like i said, the overall quality with example Nokias Carl ziess lenses comes via their own camera software....(im not saying example N82 lens is crap, BUT its not the lens who make everything vivid and sharp).
this is was im talking about.......... Sony lenses produce outstanding sharpness and details.
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=18203
hope the keep developing their own lenses in the future...they rocks
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 16:40:33
Edit :
Quote
Edit:
How can you say I'm wrong when you just posted the same?
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2009-03-20 15:43 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 16:41:54
Edit :
Quote
For compacts and camphones, the carl zeiss lenses are the better 1's
carl zeiss lens ,
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]18200&make=sony&model=dsc-p100
plenty of detail no smearing/bluring
sony lens , random blur to the right
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c702
and again
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c702
and again
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c702
spoilt my dam pictures , thats not handshake blur the entire photo would be blurry if it was handshake blur.
[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2009-03-20 15:48 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 16:47:57
Edit :
Quote
I do find with my c510 and with my old K800i that corners and some detail is blurred. Nokia phones do produce sharp images but very over sharpened sometimes with unnatural colours.
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 16:49:00
Edit :
Quote
It's not overall sharpness , whatever the sharpness level it should be consistant from corner to corner with a good lens.
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 16:50:36
Edit :
Quote
According to this Motorola zn5 is also using Carl Zeiss optics:
http://www.motorola.com/media[....]Id=9966_9895_23&pageLocaleId=8
"5 Megapixel
Autofokus
4fach-Digitalzoom
Carl Zeiss Optik"
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 16:50:37
Edit :
Quote
xironghostx,
Funny - Motorola partnered with Kodak on the ZN5.
On 2009-03-20 16:50:36, number1 wrote:
It's not overall sharpness , whatever the sharpness level it should be consistant from corner to corner with a good lens.
At f/2.8? Are you kidding me? That's optically impossible.
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2009-03-20 15:54 ]
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 16:51:53
Edit :
Quote
It's a kodak sensor and carl zeiss lens.
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 16:54:41
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-03-20 16:51:53, Mizzle wrote:
At f/2.8? Are you kidding me? That's optically impossible.
I'm not on about what looks focused and whats not, you can't blame the aperture for blurry corners or the enitire right hand side of a pic being blurred, the sharpness of the entire pic even the less focused parts should be the same from corner to corner.
--
Posted: 2009-03-20 17:04:38
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
