>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> What camera-optimized phone to get?
Bookmark topic
On 2009-04-18 15:43:00, number1 wrote:
All camphones have shutter lag, they need to use long exposure times and they need to give prioty to shutter speed rather than the iso to get better quality, i'd recommend the T650 or K770 they have a larger aperture so don't need such long exposure time like the rest.
I have the K770. It's a very good camphone but the autofocus is slow.
--
Posted: 2009-04-18 18:45:25
Edit :
Quote
I suppose the memory you save pics to could make a difference too?
--
Posted: 2009-04-19 17:02:01
Edit :
Quote
I'd say get a "new" k750. Best
phone ever.
--
Posted: 2009-04-19 17:26:48
Edit :
Quote
The C902 gets smeary in low-light,
wait for the C901 it has a xenon flash aswell , if you want a good camera phone, the C901 sample pics in the photo section look promising.
It's not a camera phone but i think the P1 makes very good pics, quite impressed by it's camera which i didn't even care about when buying it, the large 2.6" makes a excellent viewfinder and you can operate it by touch, also i find it to be pretty quick not suffering from too much shutter lag.
--
Posted: 2009-04-19 17:33:30
Edit :
Quote
best camera against the money is C902 (without any doubts). it have also best buildquality among all other models which is a BIG Plus............
if you want even cheaper i should go for K810....(but A200 UI + all features makes C902 more funnier to use)
good luck
besides, C902 does not suffers of slow auto focus, (its nearly to fast and accurate
) without any exaggerate.
--
Posted: 2009-04-19 17:34:10
Edit :
Quote
i should not wait for c901...it have awful colours, (yeh, ive seen even daylight...and it had very weak colour-quality)
c902 with R3EA037 is better in most all aspects, (otherwise, K810/k800 is a better choice then c901 if you can live without A200)
even lowlight iso-200 looks good now with c902.
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=18354
R3EA037 is a such great improvement from 028
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=19091
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=18759
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=18675[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-19 16:53 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-19 17:49:12
Edit :
Quote
It's alot easyer to touch up the colours rather than the quality, the K800/K810 has average shutter lag and i owned 1 and didn't think the camquality was that great also the video was useless. The C702 was alot better but is the worst for shutterlag, i find the P1 for have the best alround 3.2mp cam.
This is how 5mp photos should look:
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]18201&make=sony&model=dsc-p100
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]18200&make=sony&model=dsc-p100
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]18199&make=sony&model=dsc-p100
--
Posted: 2009-04-19 17:57:21
Edit :
Quote
he he...are you mad, thats taken with a real digi camera with real optic. (no cellphone on earth have a smallest chance there)
c902 is (if i compare all my
from t610 and forward) the cellphone with best camera, (auto focus, colours, sharpness, macro,
--
Posted: 2009-04-19 18:18:08
Edit :
Quote
Ive never used a camphone with more than 3.2mp, out of all the phones with cams i've used, i like the P1's 1 the most , its fast aswell so that would be my recommendation. Moving away from se the nokia n96 has a very decent cam.
--
Posted: 2009-04-19 18:32:58
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
