Sony Ericsson / Sony : Windows Mobile : X-1? Thanks, but no thanks.
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Windows Mobile
> X-1? Thanks, but no thanks.
Bookmark topic
Residentevil Posts: > 500
On 2009-04-20 10:22:18, Rookwise wrote:
Seconded. I find Symbian to be much more user friendly over WM.
This message was posted from a WAP device
Same here. UIQ on P1 is more fun. When using WM I always feel like I am using another PC.
--
Posted: 2009-04-21 02:05:05
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-04-21 02:05:05, Residentevil wrote:
On 2009-04-20 10:22:18, Rookwise wrote:
Seconded. I find Symbian to be much more user friendly over WM.
This message was posted from a WAP device
Same here. UIQ on P1 is more fun. When using WM I always feel like I am using another PC.
Just interesting - where is this "more fun" factor on UIQ?
--
Posted: 2009-04-21 11:53:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-04-19 23:00:58, masseur wrote:
but windows mobile is not windows for pc, is not based on windows for pc and is designed from the ground up as a completely mobile operating system that is purely designed to make it easier for window literate people to get the feel of the os from the start (START being a pun of course!
)
if it wasn't for iphone I would still be using WM as my main device as it is such a capable and well supported operating system in the community
Windows Mobile is NOT designed from the ground up for smartphones.
First & foremost - until WM7 - its still based off of WinCE (regardless of the version) hence the reason for cab files. Cab files have been used in every version of WM or PPC-PE or PocketPC the old PDA's of Compaq kingdom and even today. WinCE is very maleable but it still remains at the core - sure they call it .net based now but its a layer over wince.
--
Posted: 2009-04-23 09:34:48
Edit :
Quote
yep, you're quite right. I had been reading a few articles earlier in the day about how WM7 is being built from the ground up and (notice the time of my post) got a bit confused in my reply. Thanks for the correction
--
Posted: 2009-04-23 09:56:33
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
