>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> p800 vs 7650
Bookmark topic
LOL!!! :-)
This message was posted from a Nokia 7650
--
Posted: 2003-01-21 18:45:00
Edit :
Quote
i hate it when you say future. it's like holding on to something & hoping for the best.. aint the p800 the best yet? if it aint, why do you hope? ..in the future there'll be higher capacity ms duo.. in the future there'll be more applications.. in the future.. blech!!! hopeless piece of crap!!!
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2003-01-21 18:47:00
Edit :
Quote
7650 was a silly attempt at beating SE to the market with a phone that people would be confused into thinking was a similar spec, & it`s just a big camera phone & a good one but p800 is 10 times better + it`s a pda. 7650 is NOT.
--
Posted: 2003-01-21 18:50:00
Edit :
Quote
an overpriced brick if you ask me!
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2003-01-21 18:52:00
Edit :
Quote
@richardadc
Sure I ment build quality. Thanks for the correction!
--
Posted: 2003-01-21 19:08:00
Edit :
Quote
Orka, you can't mean that! Are you drunk?
P800 has very bad build quality, feels cheep and plastic (ugly to). The firmware is quite buggy. I will choose the 7650 because:
Better build quality.
Better mechanic solution (camera protection).
Less buggs than P800.
More 3:e part software.
Less uglier than P800.
Better camera (at night).
Nokia is better on software and mechanic than SE.
/Mattias
--
Posted: 2003-01-21 20:19:00
Edit :
Quote
better camera protection? the P800 also has a protection! not that you can cover it up just like the 7650 but the lens is behind screens ( i don't know how to say that
) nobody would put a camera with no protection!!
Less uglier?? so you say that 7650 is ugly?? Less bugs?? well until now i haven't found no bugs in my P800! with my 7650 i already updated it twice! and btw, the P800 must have bugs, cuz it's new in the market and the 7650 is already 6 or more months old. 7650 has a bad picture quality at night. you can't see things when you look at it!
More 3rd Party softwares?? c'mon how long is the P800 out?? answer that and then you'll have your answer!!
--
Posted: 2003-01-21 20:29:00
Edit :
Quote
@mattias:
u really mean BUILDING quality in that case, right?
--
Posted: 2003-01-21 20:41:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2003-01-21 20:19, Mattias wrote:
Better build quality.
Better mechanic solution (camera protection).
Less buggs than P800.
More 3:e part software.
Less uglier than P800.
Better camera (at night).
Let's see now:
1. Arguable; I've seen 7650s break into 2 pieces from a simple fall onto a carpet
2. NO "slide" design is good; it leads to a much higher rate of failure, is a weakpoint in any design and can get eroded or corroded easily. Also, it's a major spot for mechanical and structural failure (see answer number 1)
3. Less bugs? Perhaps, but easily corrected. But with about 2-3 times the features, having 2 times the bugs just makes them more noticeable.
4. How much 3rd-party software was out when the 7650 came out? Not much either, huh?
5. "Less uglier"? Well, this all depends on taste; can't argue with you just because our tastes differ.
6. Better camera? A lot of people make a fuss about the 7650 "nightshot", but this can be easily replicated (and even done better) using the P800 advanced camera controls. In either case, the picture quality of the P800 is better, with a sharper focus and none of that horrid blue-tint to all photographs.
--
Posted: 2003-01-21 20:43:00
Edit :
Quote
This topic exists already
use the search function next time
--
Posted: 2003-01-21 20:46:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
