>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> k800i vs c902
Bookmark topic
Thanks to all dudes, but as I had asked 3 times how are the music capabilities and their quality? Where is the better sound and a louder speaker?
--
Posted: 2009-07-07 09:15:32
Edit :
Quote
C902 have better build quality? this sounds like BS and negation of very good quality of K800 only because of fact that C902 is smaller. I even don't remember how many times my K800 received hard lessons. because of my passion to MTB this phone often falls down on the rubble, rocks, asphalt at the high speed. twice I crushed him with the back during the fall. nothing wrong happened, except of a few scratches on the back panel and camera flap
hawkinskola
K and C phones were not designed to musical raptures. I guess both have quite similar capabilities and you don't have to worry about loudness because you can change sound drivers to boost effect
--
Posted: 2009-07-07 10:09:52
Edit :
Quote
c902 have better sound the quality of the sound you can recognized by the low and high sound
--
Posted: 2009-07-07 10:22:45
Edit :
Quote
Thanks to all, finaly I bought
k800i coz it's 70 $ cheaper, and faster compared to c902, also the speaker is much louder. I also got hpm82 headphones with it =D
--
Posted: 2009-07-08 10:51:56
Edit :
Quote
well, i can tell you one thing. k800 with original cam driver is worse in lowlight then c902. (c902 sensor capture more light and there by gets a bit better)....been there, done that.
k800
c902
ps...k800 faster then c902 ???? (what world do you come from
)try latest fw to c902 then give you answer. besides c902 records in stereo and have better bitrate. (the video sound are light years better), c902 are just much better (and more fun to use)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-07-08 10:22 ]
--
Posted: 2009-07-08 11:14:16
Edit :
Quote
stop. we have seen these pics many times, time to clean camera front glass in K800
--
Posted: 2009-07-08 11:21:16
Edit :
Quote
oh my, are you really thinking that a original k800 produce better lowlight pics then c902....he he....(have you
ever tried c902 ????
PS...I could post xxxxxx pics and everyone should look the same.
its no smudge on the front glass on this pictures. it how they became....how hard can it be man.........
k800
c902
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-07-08 10:33 ]
--
Posted: 2009-07-08 11:26:17
Edit :
Quote
blah blah blah...
I'm sick of watching the same pics all the time since many months in many threads, I'm sick of your pathetic comparisions, I'm sick of reading how great is C902 and how bad is K800, I'm sick of you, I'm sick of your C902. I'M NOT SAYING THAT K800 IS BETTER THAN C902, I'm saying that I'm sick because of your blind fanatism - C902 vs. rest
ps. I bet we have seen this xxxxxx pics many times before in other threads. NO! we don't want to see them again!
pss. poor you. your K800 sucks, my not, guess why
its no smudge on the front glass on this pictures. it how they became....how hard can it be man.........
prevaricator
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-07-08 11:09 ]
--
Posted: 2009-07-08 11:52:57
Edit :
Quote
Plank, I've played with my friend's c902 after I bought my k800, the second's (k800i) interface and gallery is much faster then c902's. As for video recording I have sanyo hd700 wich is much better then any phone in the world in video recording. I've just tried the both cameras, c902 is a bit better in the daylight, and the k800i is much better with flash, bo dought. As at any other conditions i don't know, as I haven't tried yet. and Raidsky is right best is to clean the glass otherwise it would be blury.
and as I already said k800's speaker is much, I repeat, much stronger the c902's.
[ This Message was edited by: hawkinskola on 2009-07-08 11:20 ]
--
Posted: 2009-07-08 12:01:22
Edit :
Quote
He he he K800/K810 is the winner !! It rules !! Havent you seen my K810 photos ?? Its so different to plankgatan k800 picture
--
Posted: 2009-07-08 13:18:46
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
