>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> C902 vs N95-1
Bookmark topic
hehehe ya guys r funny
--
Posted: 2009-09-22 19:07:26
Edit :
Quote
More photos to compare!
1st: Indoor all auto, no flash
2nd: Low-light indoor macro, no flash
1st:
N95
C902
C902 again (lowered EV a bit)
2nd:
N95
C902
What do you think?
--
Posted: 2009-09-22 19:46:25
Edit :
Quote
your c902 is faulty thats all hahaha
--
Posted: 2009-09-22 20:00:26
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-09-22 20:00:26, mrjulius wrote:
your c902 is faulty thats all hahaha
hahaha?
Can you face the sudject like a grown man? My C902 isn't faulty, I've had very nice pictures with it, but those are just a little percentage of all photos i've taken. Please, show me some indoor pictures of your living room as these!
--
Posted: 2009-09-22 20:11:00
Edit :
Quote
photobucket
flickr
check this out
--
Posted: 2009-09-22 20:13:21
Edit :
Quote
also check planks flickr
planks flickr
--
Posted: 2009-09-22 20:17:06
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-09-22 20:17:06, mrjulius wrote:
also check planks flickr
planks flickr
Man, that does not mean anything. I also have good C902 fotos in my flickr and I know that it can take good fotos! The matter is that the N95 is a much better all-round camera than C902 and behaves much better in almost every situation (even the LED flash is better). Although, I do believe that C902 is only better in strong day-light macros. C902 has a nice camera but it should be much (much!) more versatile for its price and outstanding camera-phone pseudo status.
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2009-09-22 20:12 ]
--
Posted: 2009-09-22 21:08:29
Edit :
Quote
nope c902 beats n95 i have also n95
also beats in video
qvga vs vga
we know that vga is more quality it wins only the bigger size video hehehe
not in frames by frames
[ This Message was edited by: mrjulius on 2009-09-22 20:14 ]
--
Posted: 2009-09-22 21:11:27
Edit :
Quote
So in zide's comparison the N95 wins but in mrjulius' comparison the C902 is the winner? Clearly both comparisons are invalid as the winner 'just' happens to be phone each person likes the most...
As far as I am concerned,
both phones are fairly equal as camera phones when the photos are viewed at full size:
- One produces very noisy photos with purple fringing and excessive sharpening.
- The other produces photos with excessive noise reduction making them look like water color paintings.
- Both look very good when the photos are viewed at reduced size.
Of course plank is offline, otherwise this thread would have been filled with abuse and insults towards anyone saying anything bad about his [gollum]precious[/gollum]
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2009-09-23 05:38 ]
--
Posted: 2009-09-23 06:33:38
Edit :
Quote
Of course plank is offline, otherwise this thread would have been filled with abuse and insults towards anyone saying anything bad about his [gollum]precious[/gollum]
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2009-09-23 05:38 ]
Rofl!
Well, there is some people who can't admit that their stuff (cell-phones in this case) might be inferior of what they should (c902 camera is completely under expectations) and that leads their subconscience to get biased fotos and biased avaluations. They will only change the opinion and, pherhaps, admit it, when something better comes and replaces de old one.
As told, I like very much my C902 even tho its crappy display size however, I admit that its weakest point is its camera (as it should be the strongest!). And yes MrJulius ad Plankgatan, it can take great photos but they come 2 out of 10. With N95 (which isn't already an high-end Nokia camera phone) I got almost every photo with the right focus and with a right light management. It's all about efficiency.
Atention that I prefer SE to Nokia.
--
Posted: 2009-09-23 13:28:26
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
