Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Help with : C901 vs W995 vs s8300 vs some Nokia phones
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Help with : C901 vs W995 vs s8300 vs some Nokia phones
Bookmark topic
I have asked the same questions, there's a lot of good cameraphones/music phones similiar to W995 and C901
Phones that ive heard have good cameras
N86
N82
Nokia 6700
Motozine ZN5
Samsung Jet/Pixon
Satio
there are loads of them, it really depends on how much money you are gonna spend
[ This Message was edited by: mriley on 2010-03-03 21:03 ]
--
Posted: 2010-03-03 22:03:19
Edit :
Quote
Thanks guys. I checked the Samsung Jet but I'm so pessimist about Samsung, I donno why. I believe since Sony has a brand on creating cameras, thus creates better camera phones. I know samsung creates cameras too but they want to impress people with their small size, instead of quality. at least that's what I believe.
--
Posted: 2010-03-03 22:06:11
Edit :
Quote
I also have the Nokia 6700 but I do not think much more of it's features will meet your requirements. Otherwise its a fab camera & phone. The N82 you could find cheaper now I am sure. The N86 it is great but I am sure if you shop around you can find it under £300. The jet is your best alrounder & I recommend it as the best but gaming is not the best. The Jet I got for £199 @ Carphone & it also has the best LED flash you will see.
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2010-03-03 21:12 ]
--
Posted: 2010-03-03 22:06:19
Edit :
Quote
i hate/can't belive i'm saying this but samsung is superior to sony ericsson in cellphone cameras much better photo processor plus samsung haves full access to samsungs digital cameras department and sony ericsson doesn't.
plus samsung has fewer problems with their phones than SE and that's a fact .Even nokia seems to have more problems in this section than samsung
Anyway everybody haves their taste ......
--
Posted: 2010-03-03 22:18:12
Edit :
Quote
Well much as I do like
they have gone off the boil for me. I hope they improve. I have not had a single problem with my Jet or 6700. Samsung cameras are excellent & from what I have seen alot
cameras are not what they used to be. Shame. I have no idea what your talking about with Samsung small size
The Jet ain't that small & it's far better in quality in every respect to most recent
mobiles. Samsung is a brand same as Sony is it not? Samsung have over taken Sony in alot of ways.
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2010-03-03 21:24 ]
--
Posted: 2010-03-03 22:21:57
Edit :
Quote
I agree with the points - but I think photo quality is a hard thing to judge and in my opinion definitely shouldn't be judged by its speification - so many people think the bigger the MP count the better the quality, if you hear any question about a camera people have just seen they will be asking how many mega-pixels it has. I think the only way you can test picture quality is to either view identical shots taken with a tripod (so no cam shake) and look at them full size side by side - a better way would be to print them out, but you'll find loads of reviews that just waffle about how good the camera is - just judging it by its specs
My advice is to get experience with the phones and do lots of reading reviews about them to make the right decision
--
Posted: 2010-03-03 22:39:41
Edit :
Quote
- c901 has something most good phones don't have: Real xenon flash. Also arguably the best camera phone on the market.
- For music, it's pretty good, but GSM arena notes it has very poor frequency response
- You can download games and apps from sony ericsson, but you'll have to buy a memory card and data cable.
- Can't play DIVX or anything fancy.
- No wifi, and the internet browser is pretty bleh.
The Nokia N-8x series fits your requirements pretty well, especially the n86. Downside: Large size and pricey.
I dunno if this was brought up yet, but
LG secret.
- Plays DIVX.
- A pretty good 5mp camera. And one of the best video cameras on the cell phone market.
- Very good audio quality.
- No Wifi, but the browser ain't too bad.
- 99% sure there are some decent downloadable games for it out there.
- Battery life is lower than the other phones you are looking at.
- Possibly one of the largest fingerprint magnet offenders in existence.
[ This Message was edited by: LumberJack on 2010-03-03 22:25 ]
--
Posted: 2010-03-03 23:14:00
Edit :
Quote
I agree with what Matt says mega pixels mean nothing although between 3 and 5 mega pixels a difference can be seen. But the c901 is looking a bit dated now Sony Ericsson need an over haul
--
Posted: 2010-03-03 23:17:00
Edit :
Quote
On 2010-03-03 23:17:00, Bonovox wrote:
I agree with what Matt says mega pixels mean nothing although between 3 and 5 mega pixels a difference can be seen. But the c901 is looking a bit dated now Sony Ericsson need an over haul
Dated? It's the smallest thing out there with xenon flash and a camera that doesn't suck.
And, while MPs don't mean much, 80% of the time more MPs = better camera quality in the cell phone world.
--
Posted: 2010-03-03 23:20:06
Edit :
Quote
Its got nothing to do with size. I am saying that Sony Ericsson interface is starting to look tired and dated and needs refreshing. Its getting boring now. Yes they have a Xenon flash but i still think imo Sony Ericsson cameras are getting worse thats just what i think. Having recently used other mobiles going back to the Sony Ericsson interface for me now is not feeling as exciting as it once was. Some of their phones feel like toys and nothing screams innovative anymore. I hope they improve and these are my opinions.
--
Posted: 2010-03-03 23:30:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply