>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Symbian phones
> p900 vs 6600
Bookmark topic
well i wouldn't say the comparison is good vs bad, like some of you have mentioned (mercedes vs lada)
it's more of a apples to oranges thing.
the p900 is a smartphone, and the 6600 is a phone with some data capabilities. so to stay on the car-level, it would be like comparing a mercedes to a pickup truck. you can't haul your winter's supply of firewood with a mercedes, and you can't cruise at 350MHp with the pickup.
i'd take the pickup, though ...
--
Posted: 2003-10-28 12:27:57
Edit :
Quote
mores, that's not quite accurate either since the P900 can do anything the 6600 can do...but not vice versa.
Like you said, the 6600 is a phone with SOME data capabilities... but the P900 is a hybrid... phone functionality is not compromised in any way. So it IS like comparing a McLaren F1 to a Ford Focus.
Nokia is not a crappy phone company... they just make basic phones...that look cute...period. Nothing wrong with that. (Other than their abnormally high prices)
--
Posted: 2003-10-28 12:40:18
Edit :
Quote
i suppose that makes sense.
yeah. forget what i was saying
--
Posted: 2003-10-28 13:28:30
Edit :
Quote
So to continue to analogy, the Nokia may be like the Mercedes, but the P900 is a truck with all the handling, power and cruising speed of the Mercedes. Are we getting any closer?
--
Posted: 2003-10-28 14:38:04
Edit :
Quote
Athlon64 FX vs. Pentium 4...
The P900 being the Athlon FX. Can do anything the P4 can and faster, but also has 64 bits for much higher capabilities.
--
Posted: 2003-10-28 17:00:22
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
