Esato Mobile
General discussions : Other manufacturers : Samsung T100 - an opinion
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Other manufacturers > Samsung T100 - an opinion Bookmark topic
Page <  123>

Deltayoda Posts: > 500

If it was Tri-band, I'd probably get it.
--
Posted: 2002-05-23 01:19:00
Edit : Quote

Eamonn Posts: > 500

T100 is too big
--
Posted: 2002-05-23 10:52:00
Edit : Quote

Deltayoda Posts: > 500

I find the T100 nice looking for a flip flop phone, but the problem is, it has no bluetooth, no Tri-band (big boobo), and lousy battery life.

Eventually, someones gotta release a phone with 256+ color screen, Tri-band, bluetooth and a good bettery, if they can do that, then we can start comparing it to the T68i

--
Posted: 2002-05-24 07:48:00
Edit : Quote

Deltayoda Posts: > 500

Take a look at this:

http://www.gsmarena.com/index.php3?sRedir=http://www.gsmarena.com/phone.php3?idPhone=314

and this one

http://www.gsmarena.com/index.php3?sRedir=http://www.gsmarena.com/phone.php3?idPhone=313

Both Tri-band, might be interesting
--
Posted: 2002-05-24 07:56:00
Edit : Quote

waterboy Posts: 4

@ orang3:

No problems found here, and yes, the T100 does have a vibra message alert (unlike the call alerts though, you can't have it on vibra and melody)

@ Fingers:

T9 works fine for me ... not much difference between T100 and Sony J5 (IMHO) and much faster than T68 from what I've heard. Only problem I've had was mentioned previously (no character counter)

@ Fingers & Deltayoda:

Battery life is a little poor, although you do get two batteries supplied, a normal one and an extended life one. I've not used the extended life battery yet (a little bulkier than the other, no surprise...). As I don't spend long on calls the battery life is OK for my own circumstances, a quick hour or so charging every 3 days does it for me.....

@ Deltayoda

No Bluetooth, no Tri-band. I know. Personally I don't need them. I know the T68, for example, has many more feautures than the T100 but it does what I want and does it nicely.
--
Posted: 2002-05-25 14:04:00
Edit : Quote

lor Posts: > 500

samsungs have always sucked, just like the motorolas.

there's no comparison with those phones and the 68
--
Posted: 2002-05-27 10:23:00
Edit : Quote

daern Posts: 4

Just out of interest, I thought the T68 was *really* slow. That's certainly one thing that you can't say about the T100. Also, the T100 is almost exactly the same size...

But the ringtones suck REALLY bad.
--
Posted: 2002-05-31 16:54:00
Edit : Quote

waterboy Posts: 4

Quote:
But the ringtones suck REALLY bad.


Are you sure? The T100 ringtones?
Purlease .... it's a nice change to hear something at least vaguely musical, after years of beeps and piercing squeals that supposedly pass for 'tunes'.

Sorry if I misunderstood your post


I'd like to find polyphonic tones for download that are compatible with the Samsung .mmf format but so far no luck. There's a huge selection on the CD which accompanies the T100, but, as they're almost exclusively clips of classical music, I could do with some more modern sounds.
_________________


[ This Message was edited by: waterboy on 2002-05-31 16:09 ]
--
Posted: 2002-05-31 17:06:00
Edit : Quote

loonee Posts: 374

samsung?????? nahhhhh....i'll stick to my t68i
--
Posted: 2002-05-31 17:13:00
Edit : Quote

waterboy Posts: 4

... each to their own ... whatever floats your boat and gets you through the day.. etc.
--
Posted: 2002-05-31 17:22:00
Edit : Quote
Page <  123>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home