>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> T66/T100
Bookmark topic
The screen on the T100 is amazing,as are the screen savers,it wipes the floor with the t68.but thats it!its almost completely featureless no bluetooth,gprs,mms,camera add on,wap2.0 etc.the handset is also ugly and uncomfortable to use.

samsung mobiles also have a huge question mark over reliability,the gorgeous TFT probably wont last long!
[ This Message was edited by: dazmcc on 2002-05-22 19:36 ]
--
Posted: 2002-05-22 20:36:00
Edit :
Quote
The T100 has kinda nothing but colors, it doesn't even support GPRS, but on the other hand neither does T66 but it still is smaller
--
Posted: 2002-05-22 20:45:00
Edit :
Quote
Yeah! I just said that, copycat
--
Posted: 2002-05-22 20:54:00
Edit :
Quote
Anyway, Samsungs t100 standby and talk time suxs real..
--
Posted: 2002-05-23 01:00:00
Edit :
Quote
The T100 is gonna sell, because most of the mobile phone users don't need bleutooth, gprs, Camera, ...
The color screen is something where you can show off with, bleutooth, gprs, wap 2.0, a dumb nokia user don't understand all that.
--
Posted: 2002-05-24 02:41:00
Edit :
Quote
The T100 is a really nice phone. I was testing one for a few days. The screen is absolutly amazing!!! and the ring tones are great!
THe package comes with 2 batteries, and a battery charger, there is a standard and an extended battery. you will get at least 130hours standby out of the extended battery (depening on usage and network conditions). It is a little big, but once you flip it open and see that screen, it doesn't matter how big it is. As the others stated, it is completly featureless!! no IRDA, GPRS, etc... although it does have EMS!, but that is not great in itself!
THe T66 is also a nice phone, but it is tooo small, really looks like a toy. feature wise it is a bit better.
I have a T68, great phone, looks wise, and feature wise, but it is soooo slow!, jesus, if they could only make it "nokia speed"!!!. You see i also have a Nokia 8890. Again a great phone, a real head turner, even to this day. no features compared to the T68, but at least it is fast!
Anyway, if i had to buy eithre the T66 or the T100 tomorrow, i would go for the T100, purely because of that great screen, and it does not feel or look as much of a toy as the T66.
That is my opinion on the matter as a neutral consumer.
Thanks,
B-man
--
Posted: 2002-05-24 03:43:00
Edit :
Quote
t66 & t100, no contest and should not be compared. just like comparing a 4x4 suv to a sedan. find something it's own size or specifications.
--
Posted: 2002-05-24 04:52:00
Edit :
Quote
Yeah the T100 is a good looking phone with a fantastic screen - loads better than the T68m.. and yes i do LOVE my T68m.

will surely bring out something to compete with the display of the T100 soon enough. the T100 is a nice phone, feels solid (had the chance to play with one in the shop a few weeks ago) and although the keys are a little tricky to press (seems to be buried deep into the casing) still looks nice.. looks pretty like the 'Beam me up scotty' thing on Star Trek!!! (Sorry all those trekkies who know what that thing is called

)
Overall.. what would I go for?? Easy...
ID HAVE BOTH!!
Baz
--
Posted: 2002-05-24 10:45:00
Edit :
Quote
T100 of course!
--
Posted: 2002-05-24 12:07:00
Edit :
Quote
Belmulletman >T68i very Nokia speed, very.
[ This Message was edited by: jucame on 2002-05-24 15:18 ]
--
Posted: 2002-05-24 16:16:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply