Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : "Normal" vs. "Fine"
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > "Normal" vs. "Fine" Bookmark topic
Page <  12

buckle247 Posts: > 500

if you look at the leaves in the picture they are slightly more blurry when on normal. I use Normal, and it tells you when you can only store another 900pics . but depending on the number of colours in photos, taking one photo with a lot of colour could reduce the space left by 2 or 3 photos.
--
Posted: 2004-07-18 18:49:21
Edit : Quote

MikLSP Posts: > 500

Yes it can change by more than 1 as it's only a rough estimate.
Like u say pics at the same settings can be a lot different in size depending what's in them
--
Posted: 2004-07-18 18:54:00
Edit : Quote

marik Posts: 370

The normal picture looks a little darker than the fine one. That may just be cloud cover though.....
--
Posted: 2004-07-18 19:01:51
Edit : Quote

etaab Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2004-07-18 18:40:00, MikLSP wrote:
No mate, that's nothing to do with whether it's on fine or normal.
It only shows the number when it is not rediculously high. As fine pics are bigger u can store less & hence the numbers show.
U must have loads of free space mate! U've got 41MB to play with, use it! Mine shows the pics remaining even on the very lowest quality & size of picture as there's only about 3MB free


But on 640x480 resolution, on fine, the number is stupidly high, usually 600+ for me right now. Ive never used the normal quality setting when the phones memory is low, and ive had it down to 2mb before with lots of MP3 ringtones, games and themes. Right now i have 23mb free (since i deleted games i finished, themes i didnt like, and ringtones that sounded crap).

I just think the K700 stores enough pictures in fine mode anyway, so why bother using normal ?

_________________
This message was posted from a desktop computer

[ This Message was edited by: etaab on 2004-07-18 22:31 ]
--
Posted: 2004-07-18 23:30:20
Edit : Quote

four Posts: 96

simply because the fine pictures are grainy and are, for me, anyway, slightly more pale in colour than the normal pics but hey! do what you feel. personally, the more pics i can fit in a phone, the better - even if i do already have 467!
--
Posted: 2004-07-20 15:24:46
Edit : Quote

ares Posts: > 500

The fine looks more sharp, but a bit more grainy also...so, i think the normal setting should be used for nigh/indoor photos, to decrease the big amounts of noise those type photos have in k700.
--
Posted: 2004-07-20 15:51:44
Edit : Quote

Andrew21 Posts: 207

I think, fine has better quality as normal.
--
Posted: 2004-07-20 15:54:00
Edit : Quote

vrl29 Posts: 305

i really can't tell the difference...
--
Posted: 2005-07-24 11:03:25
Edit : Quote

blackspot Posts: > 500

Fine uses less compression that's why it shows more details (grainy specially in poor lighting). Normal mode uses more compression so a lot of details will appear to be patches of plain blocks (blurry). I always use fine as it gives you a more accurate detail of textures. In the two photos in the first page you can see the difference in the texture of the floor and the pot.
--
Posted: 2005-07-25 05:20:40
Edit : Quote

xerx Posts: 375


not too much difference harhar
--
Posted: 2005-07-25 05:42:00
Edit : Quote
Page <  12

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home