Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : Which one - S700 & Razr V3 & V800 & Mpx220 & E800 ?
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Which one - S700 & Razr V3 & V800 & Mpx220 & E800 ?
Bookmark topic
But for my opinion S700 has more good design than Mpx220 hasnt it?
and Mpx220 has 1.2 mpx and more small screen and 65000 colors...
s700 s 262k,1.3 mpx and large screen...cant I surf internet like a pc in s700?
--
Posted: 2004-09-25 12:54:55
Edit :
Quote
No you can't. Display is beautiful. Everything other is better on mpx. Trust me.
This message was posted from a K700i
--
Posted: 2004-09-25 13:02:39
Edit :
Quote
from Bengal Boys
Cons:
Screen is smaller than MPx200's
Screen is not as bright as MPx200's
External screen looks terrible
Camera has extremely poor image quality
Speakerphone not very loud
Bluetooth/Operating system integration could use more work
--
Posted: 2004-09-25 13:13:08
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-09-25 12:15:12, Atlis wrote:
There is only minor difference between them 'cause both have 1.3MPix cameras. S700 has better screen but Mpx is running Windows. I would never change Mpx for S7. Btw can you tel us a price of Mpx in Turkey? In usd or euro please.
This message was posted from a K700i
You
clearly see some
BIG differences in terms of image quality between the S700 and MPx220. Colour saturation and image clearness is far superior than Motos MPx220. Bengalboy did a comparison between these handsets in his review.
Shots taken with the Sony Ericsson S700i
[imb]http://www.pbase.com/image/33125615/original.jpg[/img]
Shots taken with the MPx220
I know which one I would have chosen and to be honest, image quality to MPx220 is terrible. It is even worse than the K700i in extended mode. Everything is much better to MPx220 and trust you?? I don't think so.
[ This Message was edited by: McKinley on 2004-09-25 12:26 ]
--
Posted: 2004-09-25 13:20:50
Edit :
Quote
Yes the result is clear,We cant compare both phones in same category...S700 is far more good,thanks MK...and both price s so near...540 euro for S700 and 520 euro for mpx220 in Turkey...
--
Posted: 2004-09-25 13:24:27
Edit :
Quote
yeah I'd say you should go with the s700 but the cons are restricted external memory to 128 & the price of mem stick duos, the inability to play fullscreen videos (could probably be fixed in later firmware).... I think thats it. If ur still nt sure I think you shold try them both in the shop before you buy.
--
Posted: 2004-09-25 14:02:34
Edit :
Quote
Nobody for 410? I did go for it.
This message was posted from a T230
--
Posted: 2004-09-25 14:25:44
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-09-25 12:54:55, Clearday wrote:
Mpx220 has 1.2 mpx and more small screen and 65000 colors...
No, its 262k colours too, indors the s700 screen wins but outdoors, the mpx220 has better visibility in sunlight compared to the S700 and V3.
Quote:
On 2004-09-25 12:54:55, Clearday wrote:
s700 s 262k,1.3 mpx and large screen...cant I surf internet like a pc in s700?
No, on the S700 u cant view sites like on your PC, however on the mpx220 u can, it has internet explorer.
Well, if u want a good camera go for the S700, but if u want a power packed phone, and dont mind crappy pics go for the Moto. U wanted to listen to MP3s right ? The Moto takes bigger capacity memory cards (mini SD, currently max is 512mb but IMHO there will be 1Gb mini SDs
) compared to the 128mb on the S700. I've read both the reviews by bengalboy and I decided to buy the Moto
But that's just me. That's because I already have a great digicam and dont mind the crappy pics produced by the moto. However do bear in mind that is a prototype and not the final product
IMHO, I think even Bengalboy prefers the Moto
Head over to Howardforums.com and read the reviews
Then, as another member has sugested, head over to the shops and play with botht the phones to see which is better
Cheers,
~Jeev~
--
Posted: 2004-09-25 14:34:49
Edit :
Quote
i would suggest going for s700 instead of razr
the interface is more neat
screen quality is more vibrant
more storage space (razr has only 5.5mb internal memory)
if listening to mp3 is a priority then should consider memory capacity
motorola's phone tend to be slow on start up, loading contacts and running java.. while S700 can load much more faster..if u use k700 before u will notice how fast it is
not to mention too that charging motorola's phone battery take damm long (2 1/2 hours when i charged my v80)
while charging a SE phone takes less than a hour
and i think while the razor keypad may look cool
but dont think it will be practical for messaging and games
--
Posted: 2004-09-25 14:37:03
Edit :
Quote
Guys, I have K7 and S7 is practicaly the same. MPx220 is smartphone, with much better usage. 1.3 mega pixel camera is and will always be shit. Since I have 5Mpix, I know what I'm talking about. Maybe I have different needs, 'cause imho S7 can't compete with Mpx. It's another class. If you need only camera, go for S7, if you need something more get Motorola.
This message was posted from a K700i
--
Posted: 2004-09-25 14:40:53
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
