Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : SE S700 vs Samsung SGH- D500
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > SE S700 vs Samsung SGH- D500 Bookmark topic
Page <  123456789>

dinky Posts: 43

@aquila2, why do you say that the samsung has a better address book and calendar? Im not familiar with samsung. Se's calendar lacks a few things like birthdays for one.
--
Posted: 2004-10-11 04:13:00
Edit : Quote

*Jojo* Posts: > 500

I want to see some pics of that Samsung fone ! Looks like a close fight here mates?
--
Posted: 2004-10-11 04:19:38
Edit : Quote

whizkidd Posts: > 500

So, anyone going for the Samsung? This message was posted from a T230
--
Posted: 2004-10-11 09:17:46
Edit : Quote

wrecked_porsche Posts: > 500

The only thing i need to see is the implementation of the BT in the Samsung D500... It BETTER be good... If its the same as their IRda then... .... My friend had a V200 and the IRda was useless!! He could not send ANTHING through the IRda port... sheesh...
--
Posted: 2004-10-11 09:25:37
Edit : Quote

TheRealSpawn Posts: > 500

D500 is no direct match for S700

D500 Screen is only 1.9" with 176x220 pixels - same size and resolution as K700 though 262K. Phone itself is smaller than K700.

S700 Screen is 240x320 pixels on a much larger 262K screen

D500 camera is CMOS while S700 camera is CCD - I've seen one picture taken with D500 and it was not in S700 quality.

S700 also has memoryslot giving an option for endless memory through change of memorycards.

I see D500 more as a very serious competitor to K700 rather than to S700.



--
Posted: 2004-10-11 12:40:33
Edit : Quote

Ben.Cook Posts: 103

Anybody know what the price is going to be like? I'm guessing it will be more than the K700 but quite a lot less than the S700.
--
Posted: 2004-10-11 12:50:45
Edit : Quote

blackspot Posts: > 500

I hope Samsung's IR is useful for sharing this time - in their previous models, IR are practically useless, IMO. I'm also not so sure about their bluetooth implementation as this is probably their first commercial model with a BT. I also think 80MB is not enough for a 1.3MP camera with MP3 player. If this was released during the time K700 was released, I would have chosen this one over the K700 though.

It seems like D710 that they announced last year will never get released after all. Bad Samsung!
--
Posted: 2004-10-11 12:59:14
Edit : Quote

TheRealSpawn Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2004-10-11 12:59:14, blackspot wrote:
I hope Samsung's IR is useful for sharing this time


Propably not - as the D500 doesnt have IR at all

--
Posted: 2004-10-11 13:46:09
Edit : Quote

shyam335 Posts: > 500

Damn,are they following nokia,without including ir This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2004-10-11 13:53:14
Edit : Quote

vineet_d Posts: > 500

and the talk time is just 3-4 hrs
--
Posted: 2004-10-11 13:57:27
Edit : Quote
Page <  123456789>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home