General discussions : Other manufacturers : Is there any competition for the 6630 ?
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> Is there any competition for the 6630 ?
Bookmark topic
Direct hit by slattery69
Spec wise it is the best!!!!!!!!!!!!from Nokia
[ This Message was edited by: IT2005 on 2005-01-15 17:08 ]
--
Posted: 2005-01-15 18:04:46
Edit :
Quote
Still wish Nokia would re-hire or find new designers....
--
Posted: 2005-01-15 18:24:21
Edit :
Quote
the cost of the video calls in the UK on same network is the same as a standard cross network call... thats 35p and cross network calls r 55p
yes they r more expensive than normal calls but jus think of what u could do on them!!! i know from personal experience an its a lot more fun seein the person...
--
Posted: 2005-01-16 16:05:44
Edit :
Quote
But still, video calling is a luxury most cant afford in some countries, but the 6630 is a great phone even without that. It comes just behind the s700 and that too because the s700's cam is better, nothing more.
I read a comment by somebody in one site - "It looks like a pen*s"
--
Posted: 2005-01-16 16:14:05
Edit :
Quote
Well one thing is for sure - Nokia can't keep up production of the mighty 6630, so huge is the demand ! Some world leading networks market the 6630 as there "top cell" for the 3G network ! Not even Nokia expected such a huge popularity.
This message was posted from a Nokia 7650
--
Posted: 2005-01-17 02:36:49
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-01-13 13:32:40, ThreeX wrote:
How about:
SE V800
SE Z1010
Motorola E1000
Motorola A1000
In swedish "Mobil" magazine, the V800 won over the 6630, only by a nose lenght, but still.
Personally iīd pick E1000 or Z1010 but thatīs just me of course..
Only one of those you mentioned is really putting competition to the 6630, ie. Moto A1000. It's the only smartphone among those, along with the 6630. Others are just 3G phones with proprietary OS with basicly no extending possibilities or atleast very minor ones with Java. So, for those the competition ends there...
Summing myself up:
- A1000 and 6630 are 3G
smartphones
- Other are just 3G phones
[ This Message was edited by: orange on 2005-01-17 11:05 ]
--
Posted: 2005-01-17 12:04:34
Edit :
Quote
The 6680 is a better 3g handset. It is smaller, looks better and has a front camera for video calls. Unlike the 6630
This message was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2005-01-17 12:18:52
Edit :
Quote
So ? R u saying that if u'v a 3g fone which isnt a 'smartfone' which can browse gprs/wap/2g gsm as wel as 3g services, theres nothing u can do except wait a few year til mor ppl hav got a '3g only' fone? . . . . . :s
This message was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2005-01-17 13:58:37
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-01-17 13:58:37, MsJ wrote:
So ? R u saying that if u'v a 3g fone which isnt a 'smartfone' which can browse gprs/wap/2g gsm as wel as 3g services, theres nothing u can do except wait a few year til mor ppl hav got a '3g only' fone? . . . . . :s
If this post was meant for me, I don't quite get what you mean.
--
Posted: 2005-01-17 14:08:54
Edit :
Quote
You talk about the 6680 ? When the hell did that one come out? And does it also have EDGE ? For me this feature is quite important.A forward or back-ward facing camera is not that important because I will not be using the video-phone feature for the next year or two.A 262K screen is even more useles because for the slight improvement in picture quality, it kills the battery ! And battery time is more important in a 'mobile' IMHO.
This message was posted from a Nokia 7650
--
Posted: 2005-01-17 19:25:47
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
