>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> T630 v Motorola V80, camera quality
Bookmark topic
i used t630, the cam is for fun, nothing else.
--
Posted: 2005-01-26 16:44:49
Edit :
Quote
O that's brilliant, i bought a sony ericsson thinking it would be better than my motorola, obivously not....go motorola
--
Posted: 2005-01-26 17:13:09
Edit :
Quote
The T630 was one of the siblings of the gradual progression of camera technology in mobile phones. It is over a year old and since then it has aged rather rapidly as anything else does in the technology world.
If you are that unhappy with it, then Sell th eT630 to more appreciative guys and get yourself a
K700i or an S700i to meet your expectations.
--
Posted: 2005-01-26 18:14:12
Edit :
Quote
well im doing my GCSE's in june/may, so out of that money i will buy a good phone.
But the thing is both phones have the same quality screen ect..o well.....maybe a not so good investment
--
Posted: 2005-01-26 18:19:43
Edit :
Quote
The camera on the T630 isn't too bad. I found that some pictures looked better once transfered to PC.
Here's one that was taken under artificial lighting:
http://www.esato.com/board/img.php?id=19810
Pictures taken in daylight are a little clearer with slightly less image noise.
I've seen MUCH worse cameras.
--
Posted: 2005-01-26 18:37:56
Edit :
Quote
This is off my Motorola V80
This is off my T630 on large settings
This is off my T300 with the camera attachment
Which is better?
[ This Message was edited by: Si_V80 on 2005-01-26 17:54 ]
--
Posted: 2005-01-26 18:52:30
Edit :
Quote
motorola looks better, but i would never go for a fone cos of the cam...
--
Posted: 2005-01-26 22:11:04
Edit :
Quote
I agree and second BobaFett.
*waves @ Boba*
--
Posted: 2005-01-26 22:22:02
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
