Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : All about W700
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > All about W700 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... , 101112>

max_wedge Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2006-11-18 17:21:18, GoldFinger wrote:
If i was to get a D750 and flash it with W800 firmware would it be the same as my W810?

Apart from Edge ?

Does the camera work the same ? Same options and auto focus etc ?

camera works exactly the same.
--
Posted: 2007-01-23 16:12:32
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2007-01-23 14:24:49, Sorrow wrote:
btw I have w700i but never been able to play .aac audio format. wierd. when the phone recieves the audio file which is.AAC it stores it in "other" files as an unknow file format. anyone got a clue why?

that's because w700 can only play AAC files in an MP4 or 3GP container. You can use dbpoweramp to convert .aac into .mp4, and possibly SUPER (c)


--
Posted: 2007-01-23 16:16:20
Edit : Quote

ampha Posts: 17

Picture quality of W700i is bit better then K750i especially when we take pictures in night using mobile light & its viedo quality is also better then K750i, and it is expensive then K750i

I had K750i it was stole then I purchased w700i because its cool function it is ditto copy of w800i in many respect. Question is why I do not perched W800i so in Pakistan the production of W800i is shut down.

--
Posted: 2007-01-24 06:23:12
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2007-01-24 06:23:12, ampha wrote:
Picture quality of W700i is bit better then K750i especially when we take pictures in night using mobile light & its viedo quality is also better then K750i, and it is expensive then K750i

I had K750i it was stole then I purchased w700i because its cool function it is ditto copy of w800i in many respect. Question is why I do not perched W800i so in Pakistan the production of W800i is shut down.


hmm, no autofocus, so many pictures wil not be as clear as K750.
--
Posted: 2007-01-25 13:39:13
Edit : Quote

bravofly Posts: 153

I have to agree with max, about 1/3 of the pictures taken are foggy and blurry. The lack of AF is noticeable, but with a little patience you can take pretty good pictures. Since the my phone is mainly for calling and texting I donīt complain too much about the camera. All things considered I think W700i is pretty good.
--
Posted: 2007-01-26 09:07:08
Edit : Quote

Badshah Posts: 93

Quote:
On 2007-01-24 06:23:12, ampha wrote:
Picture quality of W700i is bit better then K750i especially when we take pictures in night using mobile light & its viedo quality is also better then K750i, and it is expensive then K750i

I had K750i it was stole then I purchased w700i because its cool function it is ditto copy of w800i in many respect. Question is why I do not perched W800i so in Pakistan the production of W800i is shut down.



I have W700i and I have compared pics taken from K750i with W700i.

K750i pics are far sharp & clear than W700i that what I can say .... I have done many comparisons with other nokia phones as well... and u wud not believe but all other 2 MP cams take better pics than w700i 2MP cam.
--
Posted: 2007-02-20 10:35:21
Edit : Quote

BobaFett Posts: > 500

yes, cos w700 has no af
--
Posted: 2007-02-20 10:40:54
Edit : Quote

tranced Posts: > 500

@Badshah: would you make a comparison between a w700 and a w850. both phones have no AF and are 2mpx phones.
--
Posted: 2007-02-20 17:33:48
Edit : Quote

BobaFett Posts: > 500

knowing se way, those got the same cam
--
Posted: 2007-02-20 17:36:23
Edit : Quote

tranced Posts: > 500

i dont doubt it. but i've seen some pics taken by w850 and they are ok. so i wanna see a comparison.
--
Posted: 2007-02-20 17:41:02
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... , 101112>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home