News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > K800/790 vs N73: For the first time I'm considering a Nokia! Bookmark topic

I guess if you are a Se fanatic nothing will ever beat a SE. This is how life is - on the other hand the N93 and sharp903 take pictures and videos better then any SE. But then again I ain't a SE fanatic althou I Like some of their models (P-series) I would'nt hesitate to swap a N80 for a P990 which in turn get swapped for a N93. That much about loyality to any particular cell manufacturer. All of them are making money out of me - especially Nokia. Greetings from SOUTH AFRICA. MARIO :-) This message was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2006-06-11 20:33:23
Edit : Quote


shouldn't the k800 be compared to the nokia 6233 non smartphone 3g phones!
--
Posted: 2006-06-16 17:29:39
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-06-11 15:07:30, BobaFett wrote:
u cannot compare a symbian fone with k750 or k800. just to make a decision based on the cam is pointless.



yes boba,u cannot.but se isnt offerening anything against nokia's s60,and nokia is now starting to flood the maket with s60 devices from high to mid end,and s40 is now reducing to low end phones.
So we have no option but compare se's high end offereing with nokia's high end offering (yes,there is p and m series but they arent mainstream as k or w).
--
Posted: 2006-06-17 07:25:42
Edit : Quote


i hated the k750i, which is why i got the w800, it looked better.
The nokia n73 looks better, and takes video!! (unlike the SE k800, which takes some lower form of video!)

I really wanted a walkman version of the k800, but that doesnt look like its going to happen. I'll just wait to see what else sony comes out with this year...
So far my current replacement phones are:
Nokia n73
SE K800

--
Posted: 2006-06-25 08:18:17
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-06-11 17:42:45, rickster2kuk wrote:
I had a look at the photos from the N93 on mobile review and i wasn't very impressed for a 3.2 mpx camera with Carl Zeiss lens, imo there were poor, loads of grain and the image looked artifical. My k750's pictures are clearer, and i think the K800i's are much better, even without the optical zoom and Zeiss lens.

Seeing as Nokia are touting there new generation camera phones, i've not been impressed with the quality, but then i never have been overly impressed by any pictures from nokia's phones; even my k700 took better pics than my older Nokia 6230.

I think thats very early to say that as the n93 is not in its final stages and neither is the software its self, give it a chance because if my nokia 6630 can take great pictures which is comparable to SE K750 then i'm sure the n93 will blow away the K750 espeacially when its got Carl Zeiss lens.

_________________


[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2006-06-25 08:18 ]
--
Posted: 2006-06-25 09:16:44
Edit : Quote


Imo nokia 1.3 mp cams are much better the se ones, but the missing autofocus in late nokia 2 mp models made se better position This message was posted from a Z1010
--
Posted: 2006-06-25 12:08:00
Edit : Quote


i really couldnt care less about video camera quality because ive never found a use for it - however, i know these are all swanky cameraphones but the average-joe user doesnt really need 3.2mp in their daily life. sure, its nice to have it, but in my opinions the extra pixels just make the quality of lower size images better.

i would go with the se just because the interface is better. the nokis series 60 interface is frankly crap, all symbian nokias are - the ones ive used havebeen slow, are really bad at multitasking which is what theyre for and are just unintiutive - smartphones are great, just not series 60 ones - theres no real need for the extra features, as sony ericsson are doing a damn good job in proving

_________________
[b]To contact me on any of my posts, please call me on 07017012281. Text Messages cannot be sent to this number. Please allow a minimum of 35 seconds of ringing before hanging up, as the number redirects between all my phone numbes if one is unavailable.

[ This Message was edited by: andrewkeith5 on 2006-06-25 12:54 ]
--
Posted: 2006-06-25 13:53:42
Edit : Quote


i was satisfied with 6680, n70, n91, according the symbian system, imo they are very stable, didnt realised many bugs.
--
Posted: 2006-06-25 15:09:59
Edit : Quote


Quote:
On 2006-06-25 12:08:00, BobaFett wrote:
Imo nokia 1.3 mp cams are much better the se ones



This message was posted from a Z1010


I am very certain that S700 can outbest the Nokia 7610/3230 in the camera arena ! (1-1.3 mp) !
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 04:23:16
Edit : Quote


http://www.mobile-review.com/review/nokia-n93-cam-en.shtml

Near the bottom there is a comparision between the N93 cam vs the K790 cam.

N93 blows it out of the water. It should be assumed the N73 will use the same sensor, and lense but lack the optical zoom.
--
Posted: 2006-06-26 04:36:45
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index