>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> 7210 better than T68i...sorry
Bookmark topic
Quote:I don't think 'kiddies' is the correct word for it, maybe 'user non-technical' ...
How about 'normal users' or 'majority of users'? Believe it or not, most of the people buying mobile phones today actually buy them just in order to make phone calls and use SMS. They don't care about WAP, color screens, MMS, Java, polyphonic ringtones, Bluetooth, etc.
--
Posted: 2002-11-29 18:42:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:SE is always developing new communication technology, Nokia copies them.
Really? And from which SE device did Nokia copy their 6650 (a 3G dual-mode GSM/WCDMA phone)?
--
Posted: 2002-11-29 18:47:00
Edit :
Quote
@ gadgetboybottom
Quote:bluetooth?
nokia?
nope!
I didn't say that.
It is, like the rest, a standard jointly developped by a number of companies.
--
Posted: 2002-11-29 18:53:00
Edit :
Quote
Wasn't bluetooth developed by Ericsson alone?
--
Posted: 2002-11-29 18:59:00
Edit :
Quote
Ericsson is a founding member of the SIG (special interest group).
It is weird that Nokia does do bluetooth in some products but not others, ie 8910 but not 6800 for example.
I guess like a lot of people I want the product that offers everything, but becuase Nokia target their phones but release a lot of models, you rarely find everything in one Nokia phone.
SE offers everything in one phone, the T68 has to be the most complete phone at the time of its launch, ie T68m had every technology going at the time, but it's product cycle is slow, and it has fallen behind the curve.
--
Posted: 2002-11-29 19:07:00
Edit :
Quote
@faca
firstly, I am 23 years old, and I've used as much phones as any could have used in more than 8 years!! And personally, I say that SE phones are very very reliable compared to Nokia. Professionals always look for powerful and potential-full phones, not those toys that have ringtones and games, ok, they are sometimes needed but is NOT ESSENTIAL, come'on grow up!!!
And, if its for young generations that Nokia attracts, then Nokia therefore is not a diversified company ie. fones for youth, fones for business etc. but it ONLY produce for youths, which is quite boring and frustrating fones, even if they are cheap, they lack enough reliability especially in batteries which is a very important part in my opinion(as well as many other people) in any phone.
I hope you understood what I meant, this is not a fairy tale, its what I say coz I used many phones and SE is the best (even before the Sony Ericsson joint venture), Ericsson was rock hard.....
--
Posted: 2002-11-29 19:49:00
Edit :
Quote
Dude microsoft does not lose that much per console, its bout 50 or less euro and the ps2 loses the same as did the ps1
This post was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2002-11-29 20:22:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
How about 'normal users' or 'majority of users'? Believe it or not, most of the people buying mobile phones today actually buy them just in order to make phone calls and use SMS. They don't care about WAP, color screens, MMS, Java, polyphonic ringtones, Bluetooth, etc.
I couldn't agree anymore with you on that one
Faca. People just don't seem to understand that. They have some strange belief that the whole world population has or wants color phones, GPRS, WAP, MMS, JAVA, polyphonic ringtones, bluetooth, and that showing off such phones makes you look more special, when many people don't give a damn.
But hell, even the majority don't even want mobile phones and I won't go on believing what these websites talk about, due to the fact they are being payed heavily by advertisers to be deceptive in reviews and what not.
And I agree with
Devilishcry on his points. There are also some people that want some more professional phones to use. I wanted the T68i simply because it had bluetooth, IR and GPRS. I was in Europe without an internet connection and I didn't want it to happen again. I had a Nokia, but it was pretty much limited to SMS'ing and WAP. I bought a T39 before (I also bought an IPAQ at this time), but I figued later on that the T68i might be even better. The color screen was optional, but I'll admit that it makes the phone a lot more interesting. I don't really need games, I have my IPAQ for that. I don't need polyphonic ringtones, simply because they aren't loud enough. I need a long lasting battery which both the T39 and T68 have, GPRS, and bluetooth to work with my IPAQ. Still to this day I haven't seen a Nokia which can co-exist with my IPAQ very well (Believe me, I've tried them all in the shops, and it just doesn't compare to the T39 or T68).
I really have no need for showing off my phone to many people, especially here in Europe where the chances of me getting robbed is huge. So I'll just keep my phone in my pocket all the time
--
Posted: 2002-11-29 20:24:00
Edit :
Quote
Bluetooth is an Ericsson invention. AFAIK they get royalty for every bluetooth stuff that is used.
Ericsson understood that for Bluetooth to "catch on", they would have to make it an open standard and that's what they did.
I have a vague memory that I've read that Nokia and Ericsson owns the majority of the WCDMA patents (used in UMTS).
--
Posted: 2002-11-29 23:47:00
Edit :
Quote
7210 has nicer srceen and good res TFT but not smart and cute enough compared with T68(i).
personally,i still perfer my T68(i)!!
Nokia 7210 is only a model 4 the people who doesnt know what is BLUETOOTH and JAVA-APPLICATION!
U CANT use a software like PC-CONTROL 2 play with ur PC by a stupid 7210!!
haha...
check out the PC CONTROL SOFTWARE IF U HAVE GOT A T68!!
--
Posted: 2002-11-30 02:22:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
