News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > is that possible ! C905 - what the hell is wrong with this camera? Bookmark topic




I already know that.... This is what I call FAKE 8.1 MP

--
Posted: 2009-01-13 21:31:13
Edit : Quote



It does? Look at my picture.

It's not even 8.1, the pictures is 7.9902.

_________________
Nothing to see here.

[ This Message was edited by: b737 on 2009-01-13 21:05 ]

[ This Message was edited by: b737 on 2009-01-13 21:06 ]
--
Posted: 2009-01-13 22:05:21
Edit : Quote


no, you cannot take picture in weak light and then try to prove that sharpness is weak. it will be weak always in weak light conditions

if interpolation theory is true then you should be able to change 5MP picture from C902 to 8MP

from this:
http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]eview/camera/gsmarena_f003.jpg

to this:
http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]-c905/camera/gsmarena_f005.jpg


[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-01-13 21:39 ]
--
Posted: 2009-01-13 22:33:20
Edit : Quote



Owned an Innov8 prior to a C905, pretty much equal, Xenon takes all after dark though, and Pannini or whatever, i think we pretty much get the picture that your kinda obsessed with dissing the C905, stop talking out your rear orifice and move along the bus.
--
Posted: 2009-01-13 22:38:23
Edit : Quote




BullsEye !!


There is no reason to go on ranting about the same issue:

- dissapointment is acceptable as a personal reaction, but when one person has had his say once, that should be enough.

Anyone who expects 400% "better" images just because a camera has 400% more pixels, is just ignorant.
Swallow that.
And these are not even cameras - they're telephones.

Basta.

P.S. The subject of digital photography can be studied at many other sites.

( I usually recommend ImagingResource.com , where you can learn quite a few good points on photography technique as well as check out thorough professional laboratory standard tests of real cameras. And no, they don't test phones w. 'cameras' ... )
--
Posted: 2009-05-02 00:44:14
Edit : Quote


Cameras on phones are just that, an added bonus. The camera on C905 happens to take some decent daily snaps, sometimes better than others and sometimes worse. So what I'd say is that the OP expected too much out of the C905. Well I myself bought it primarily for the solid design (IMO) and Wi-Fi, and I was just pleased that the camera is not that bad. I'm not a professional photographer, I just understand a VERY small bit of photography, so I didn't see why C905 won't suit my needs. But I guess the OP was just bored
--
Posted: 2009-05-02 01:31:19
Edit : Quote



Sony Ericsson wants you to think that the camera is more than an added bonus. That's why these are branded Cyber-shot.

But the reality is just as you say. It will take still a few more years before camera phones will replace even the most basic digicams. Even my six year old 3 MP Olympus D-560 is tough competition to the C905. Why? Because of sensor type and size and most importantly the size of the lens. The phone makers need to stop fitting the camphones with pinhole-sized lenses!
If I were to buy a camphone to replace my pocket-sized digicam then I wouldn't mind if the camphone was just as large as the digicam.
--
Posted: 2009-05-02 07:40:36
Edit : Quote


That's why I hate Nokia, they carry the same pretenses (except for the powerful Symbian engine under the hoods) but pack it in an awfully designed case (IMO)!

Well if you don't mind carrying a large brick that can make really usable pics and is also capable of texting, calling, browsing etc I'd have to agree with you. Boys' toys are supposed to be oversized.
--
Posted: 2009-05-02 10:02:07
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index