>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> New Nokia N70 N90 N91
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2005-04-28 17:29:04, Qoastro wrote:
If you look at the last phone (N91), look at the phone to the very right. (I'm talking about the third picture on the first page of this topic.) Doesn't it look like a T610 in a shell?
LOL you are damn right m8 I noticed it to now =P
--
Posted: 2005-04-28 17:55:43
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-04-28 14:24:53, phsychomantis wrote:
@whiz i quoted the famous wwe superstar the rock
what i meant was that nokia has finally come back with some brilliant phones to kick the ass of all other brands
i thought u meant Nokia = brick, But a very bg brick =Rock..
--
Posted: 2005-04-28 18:17:12
Edit :
Quote
here apprently are some sample pics from one of the new nokia phones i think if they are real they are very impressive
http://www.se-nse.com/forum/showthread.php?t=351
--
Posted: 2005-04-28 18:34:14
Edit :
Quote
damn good.
--
Posted: 2005-04-29 08:36:06
Edit :
Quote
I've seen photos on link somewhere in middle of this thread, leading to n90. They look even better than old 2mpix cameras.
This message was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2005-04-29 09:19:35
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-04-28 17:45:39, ynohtna wrote:
The 3 Ns from Nokia are quite ok. However, I still have reservations about the Carl Zeiss optics since I am pretty sure, when we drop the unit, the lens will break into pieces. Hopefully, SE adopts not the Carl Zeiss but the ceramic lens from Casio Exilim technology. Lighter and stronger and possible thinner optic lenses thus resulting to a much thinner and sexier phone.
I too was wondering why Sony allowed the Carl Zeiss lenses to be installed in the 3 Nokia units.
Also one reason why SE cannot really make the ultimate phone with all those 3-8 megapixels cams,giga hard drives,etc.we are all coveting for because it will cannibalize the sales of its digital cameras and photo equipment (camcorders, etc.)
As for Nokia, no problem since they can do whatever they want for their mobile phones since that is what they are really known for and it constitutes the biggest chunk of their sales.
Miss the good ol days where when it comes to design and features, Ericsson is top notch versus nokia and the others e.g. Ericsson R520,T39,R320,T20,T28.
[ This Message was edited by: ynohtna on 2005-04-28 16:49 ]
Sony does not own Carl Zeiss... Sony Ericsson is not Sony, neither Ericsson. SonyEricsson can use whatever Sony or Ericsson owns through the SonyEricsson joint-venture agreement (e.g. Walkman brand), but when it comes to external contracting, things are different. Carl Zeiss has a partnership with Sony for products that are digital (video) cameras. SonyEricsson cannot claim that, that is obvious, so dont be pissed off. Sony cannot even complain about that. And Nokia is not a digital camera vendor. So where's the problem?!?
For Carl Zeiss, there is an opportunity to a completely new market: phones that embed digital cameras. Not digital cameras alone. Starting from there, look at SonyEricsson and Nokia market shares. Look at the tremendous market opportunity for Carl Zeiss. Game Over.
--
Posted: 2005-04-29 09:47:02
Edit :
Quote
sonyericsson should use Leica lenses the way panasonic uses them on their digital cameras.
--
Posted: 2005-04-29 10:27:47
Edit :
Quote
@numnums
You read my mind
--
Posted: 2005-04-29 10:40:30
Edit :
Quote
Look crap, and proberly are.
SE K750i going to ROCK!
--
Posted: 2005-04-30 23:15:10
Edit :
Quote
does any1 know why the n91 has a wi-fi function? it doesnt make sense. and does any1 know if the n-series or n90 have/has an inbuilt quickoffice?
--
Posted: 2005-05-01 07:39:50
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
