Esato Mobile
General discussions : Rumours : The All New Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2008
> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > General discussions > Rumours > The All New Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2008 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 100610071008 ... 174017411742>

xironghostx Posts: > 500


On 2008-05-26 19:43:59, scouser_75 wrote:


Dare I mention the new iPhone also


Lets wish that apple made more things then just added UMTS and new housing.

But this thread is dedicated to SE rumors, right?
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 19:50:52
Edit : Quote

Car Lazar Posts: 133

Yes you can
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 19:53:57
Edit : Quote

scouser_75 Posts: > 500


On 2008-05-26 19:50:52, xironghostx wrote:

On 2008-05-26 19:43:59, scouser_75 wrote:


Dare I mention the new iPhone also


Lets wish that apple made more things then just added UMTS and new housing.

But this thread is dedicated to SE rumors, right?


It is indeed. Sorry.

PK and all the other lads who have insider info, do you boys know if SE has a specific marketing strategy in place to help them sell more devices than their rivals?

I remember when the P800... and maybe even the P910 first came out - everyone HAD to have one.

After the P800 and P910 there has not been a single SE phone that has been the "must have" phone. That mantle has gone to the N95's and iPhones!

So, I'm assuming that this is down to poor SE models, dire marketing... or both of the above!

This isn't a dig at the guys who've provided us with the info on here - they're just tools of SE to muster up whispers on the street. But from what I've seen, read and heard SE just don't have the clout any more.



--
Posted: 2008-05-26 19:59:29
Edit : Quote

hgautam Posts: > 500

What is it with you guys??? Whenever SE underperforms, why do you all come up with excuses for them??? QVGA is enough??? 262k enough??? no 3.5mm jack, etc. enough??? Cybershot beaten by other brands, enough??? Average speed proccessors enough??? Not high capacity batteries, enough??? I am talking about High-ends and not starting mid-ends ones... The only phone that's an exception is the X1 and that too will launch late and at very high price compared to the competition...

The no. of phones having these features are increasing this year and next year they will be common but you all will be satisfied with these only???



[ This Message was edited by: hgautam on 2008-05-26 19:06 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 20:01:06
Edit : Quote

BoyBawang Posts: 332

Our last hope is the big screen device shown at javaone.........
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 20:03:55
Edit : Quote

NightBlade Posts: > 500


On 2008-05-26 20:01:06, hgautam wrote:
What is it with you guys??? Whenever SE underperforms, why do you all come up with excuses for them??? QVGA is enough??? 262k enough??? no 3.5mm jack, etc. enough??? Cybershot beaten by other brands, enough??? Average speed proccessors enough??? No capacity battery enough???

1) QVGA IS enough for sub-/2.4" screens.
2)They've got a patent which allows them to boost the colour reproduction of the screens without using 16 mil. colours. That way, SE phones conserve battery life.
3)Frankly, I agree with you on the 3.5mm jack thing, but I think that it is only necessary in walkmans.
4; 5) Agreed
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 20:16:33
Edit : Quote

xironghostx Posts: > 500


On 2008-05-26 20:16:33, NightBlade wrote:

On 2008-05-26 20:01:06, hgautam wrote:
What is it with you guys??? Whenever SE underperforms, why do you all come up with excuses for them??? QVGA is enough??? 262k enough??? no 3.5mm jack, etc. enough??? Cybershot beaten by other brands, enough??? Average speed proccessors enough??? No capacity battery enough???

1) QVGA IS enough for sub-/2.4" screens.
2)They've got a patent which allows them to boost the colour reproduction of the screens without using 16 mil. colours. That way, SE phones conserve battery life.
3)Frankly, I agree with you on the 3.5mm jack thing, but I think that it is only necessary in walkmans.
4; 5) Agreed


1) Yes, but not for screens >2.6". And today sreens should be larger than that in phones aimd for some type of multimedia.(high-end phones.)
2)But people buying a phone looks at the stats and not on the tecnology used. If SE got a patent they should hype it some, IMO.
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 20:25:55
Edit : Quote

NightBlade Posts: > 500

1) 2.6 is too large for feature phones, IMO (I don't see Shiho being a smartphone). You've got the P, X and G series for that.
2) I think the screens on SE's newer phones speak for themselves. As stated by nymerous reviews, they're "one of the market's finest".

[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2008-05-26 19:29 ]
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 20:28:42
Edit : Quote

Angello Posts: > 500

Guys seriously.
You can tell me that Paris' display is too small, when you had it in your hands
deal?
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 20:28:55
Edit : Quote

moogoo Posts: > 500

it's the battle of the insiders...

some say "paris has new hardware, big screen, etc etc.."

some say "paris has old hardware and generally a few features different from g900"

which to believe? ~ 3 weeks until we find out the truth...
--
Posted: 2008-05-26 20:47:15
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 100610071008 ... 174017411742>

New Topic   Topic Locked
Forum Index

Esato home