>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SE-09-Portfolio
Bookmark topic
Now, you see, this is EXACTLY what I want BUT with a 3" or so screen, basically I don't really want the phone to be bigger then my G900. If that Samsung is that size with a good camera and the touch S60 OS then I'm sold. Unless Nokia or SE can come up with something similar.
I really am after something like this and thin but a massive screen is a no no and I've a feeling this Samsung will be around 3.8" screen size which is a brick IMO.
[ This Message was edited by: apolloa on 2009-02-05 21:19 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-05 22:14:59
Edit :
Quote
To be honest, if
were to release the same X1 but with a 5MP camera people would still rave about it. There are a lot of these full touchscreen phones coming but they all lose out because the X1 has the optical joystick. Only the iPhone works well without a d-pad, every other phone struggles badly and you have to fumble a lot when you try to do anything quickly.
Also with these smartphones coming out, I can't see any that have a better design than the X1 with its fantastic qwerty. A phone is about experience and not just specs, if Samsung do a good job with the 12MP phone then great but I doubt the quality will make me ditch my digital camera. If the next Xperia is a thinner X1 with Symbian, it will be the best on show.
--
Posted: 2009-02-05 22:38:42
Edit :
Quote
so in the end it comes down 2 either a phone with a tonne of features(nokia) or one with incredible build quality(sonyericsson).
thing with having a good quality 4n with no features is that it lasts 4 ever(my K800's still gud afta 4 yrs) but u'll be too bored to use it. so it will jus gather dust on your self.
then there's the 4ns with lots of features but terrible build quality(my N85), u check ever surface twice b4 puttin it down.
wich do u pick?
--
Posted: 2009-02-05 23:11:06
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-02-05 23:11:06, Legen wrote:
(my K800's still gud afta 4 yrs)
Hmm, k800 was launched in july 2006. I must be bad at math because I only get that to 2.5 years.
--
Posted: 2009-02-05 23:32:54
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-02-05 20:56:36, recl wrote:
what's with this pesimissm...jeez the phone isn't even oficially released and people start bashing it. does it have to be a bulky brick??
[ This Message was edited by: recl on 2009-02-05 20:05 ]
First of all, I wasn't bashing it. I was just judging it from what I see.
Secondly, can't we say the same about Sony Ericsson? I've decided to leave Sony Ericsson myself, but I'm not the one here complaining how SE doesn't produce the phone I want.
--
Posted: 2009-02-05 23:49:54
Edit :
Quote
pessimism???
look the reality!
nokia use VGA video from early 2007
SE in 2009 use still qvga video!!!
--
Posted: 2009-02-06 00:22:28
Edit :
Quote
Tigershark42 Posts: > 500
^ ...and that's why the world ended
If a company has a product which is better, then get that one, why are you here?
--
Posted: 2009-02-06 00:24:49
Edit :
Quote
The i8910 does indeed look mightily impressive...I do really hope SE can produce something as 'inspiring' as this.
--
Posted: 2009-02-06 00:29:08
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-02-06 00:24:49, Tigershark42 wrote:
^ ...and that's why the world ended
If a company has a product which is better, then get that one, why are you here?
SE is
quality,definition,Particular manicured,variety of surfaces and materials
DESIGN
this is the reason
_________________
(excuse me for English)
DESIGN IS MY LIFE
[ This Message was edited by: breccia on 2009-02-05 23:35 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-06 00:34:32
Edit :
Quote
Sigh, I agree with the above ^^^^^^^^ it's just will they apply that to a product I want? If that Samsung is big, then X1 I may have to get, providing as said SE or Nokia don't match it.
I have to also admit, the Palm Pre look's damn impressive, and that's another thing, Nokia or SE Android phones?
--
Posted: 2009-02-06 00:40:34
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
