>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
Looking forward to do that
Here is my 808 + accessories:
The current conditions:
And the Nillkin case I was telling you guys about:
--
Posted: 2014-02-02 14:55:22
Edit :
Quote
I agree with mlife that it doesn't make sense to compare 5 mpx vs 40 mpx
Also the first photo is it oranges in that first box? There seems to be a difference in colour between the 808 and 1020 photo
which one is the most realistic one?
--
Posted: 2014-02-02 14:56:41
Edit :
Quote
Aussie:
The 1020 in that case. But see the first photo of the church (808:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=75378 vs 1020:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=75379) you can see how aggressive is the 1020 post-processing. Too much it hurts my eyes, specially in the tree branches.
I've noticed in good light the 808 cannot be beaten. But in shades or no good light like in the fruits shot, the 1020 compensates and has a better light balance. Well, I didn't play with the white balance, I know the manual controls in the 808 will allow to get a better photo. They were as automatic as possible.
--
Posted: 2014-02-02 15:04:18
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-02-02 15:04:18, fbloise wrote:
Aussie:
The 1020 in that case. But see the first photo of the church (808:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=75378 vs 1020:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=75379) you can see how aggressive is the 1020 post-processing. Too much it hurts my eyes, specially in the tree branches.
I've noticed in good light the 808 cannot be beaten. But in shades or no good light like in the fruits shot, the 1020 compensates and has a better light balance. Well, I didn't play with the white balance, I know the manual controls in the 808 will allow to get a better photo. They were as automatic as possible.
Agreed . Interesting to read what you said about the automatic settings - seems like 1020 would be a better fit for someone like me as I rarely bother with changing the settings
I would love to see a comparison of both in dim and low light......
--
Posted: 2014-02-02 15:20:16
Edit :
Quote
On 2014-02-01 20:29:04, Bonovox wrote:
I say & the winner is.....dumb phones
C'mon Bono, you of all people would try to fan the flames on this one.... thats shocking to me actually, I hope I misinterpreted that statment.
Cheers
Mate it was a joke
[ This Message was edited by: hihihans on 2014-02-02 19:17 ]
--
Posted: 2014-02-02 19:52:28
Edit :
Quote
Dumb phones are not that bad actually, some very low end nokias can last 30 days with a single charge. Impressive to have it as a backup phone in the car, in case of emergencies or if the car breaks to call AAA (or AA in UK).
Guys, I will try my best to make some photos in low light, have yet to find the best scenario for this. Any suggestions?
--
Posted: 2014-02-02 23:37:45
Edit :
Quote
More examples today:
Resolution: 38 MPX each photo.
808
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=75414
1020
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=75415
808
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=75416
1020
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=75417
--
Posted: 2014-02-03 18:30:33
Edit :
Quote
^ Very small difference in full resolution.. Nokia have done a very good job with the jpeg processing in full res. The 808 still has the edge, but its much smaller compared to when you use the pureview modes on both phones. Either way, the 1020 is much better than anything else out there.
On 2014-02-02 14:55:22, fbloise wrote:
Here is my 808 + accessories:
Pristine condition! Impressive
And that's a very good accessories pack..
--
Posted: 2014-02-05 18:59:39
Edit :
Quote
http://www.mobilenewscwp.co.uk/2014/02/11/nokia-bloodbath-could-turn-into-a-watershed/
End of an era
--
Posted: 2014-02-11 14:46:00
Edit :
Quote
One of Nokia's iconic devices
--
Posted: 2014-02-12 08:07:16
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
