>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Which one is better, N95 or K850?
Bookmark topic
you know as well like me, that all N95 phones dosent have this problems (you got a lucky example)......BUT there is many many people who didnt get lucky ones !
_________________
k810i
w810i
T28
k850i booked
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-07-10 23:21 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 00:21:21
Edit :
Quote
Stupid comparison. We should be comparing the rumored n82 with the 850i. Lock thread?
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 00:25:27
Edit :
Quote
I don't think I got the lucky one. maybe the other people got the "unlucky" ones.because I know 2 friends of mine who got this phone and they dont have any problems of these that you mentioned
well we could compare and the n95 with the k850i.but i agree this thread is pointless lock
[ This Message was edited by: ^D0Nt Ask^ on 2007-07-10 23:28 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 00:26:59
Edit :
Quote
anyway I believe that this whole thread is pointless and it will lead nowhere.the only think we can compare about this 2 phones is the camera. so we should wait the k850i to be released and then compare them(the cameras
)
[ This Message was edited by: ^D0Nt Ask^ on 2007-07-10 23:18 ]
i agree...................................
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 00:42:34
Edit :
Quote
The new V12 for the N95 fixed 95% and more of the problems. When was the last time SE came this close. The GPS is fast and reliable, no crashes (are you listening SE and Plank-whatever?). The phone is pretty good at this point in time.
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 00:47:46
Edit :
Quote
I agree
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 01:07:11
Edit :
Quote
No competition the N95 kills the K850i without a doubt.
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 05:41:01
Edit :
Quote
oh man... lock that thing up!
you all are clowns...
where is a MOD if you need one ?!
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 06:01:33
Edit :
Quote
Camera's, camera's, camera's. Esato has become the complain and moan capital of the world about camea phones. Fact, they will never be as good as a dedicated digital. Fact, they are meant to add value to the phone, not become a phone camera.
Come on guys and get real. Camera's in phones are nice but not the end all. Things need to be kept in prospective.
_________________
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*
-/..../../...//.../../-/.//../...//--./---/../-./--.//-/---//-/...././/-../-
[ This Message was edited by: sapporobaby on 2007-07-11 06:34 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 06:10:17
Edit :
Quote
Due to bordom, I went back and read this thread. By far, this thread is topping all others as the dumbest thread alive, naturally led by Plankton and Successor. They put guesses forward as fact then try to defend the undefendable. So for the sake of argument, has either of these two defenders of fantasy ever held this magical, mythical phone in their collective hands? Have either of them tested the features, has either had the chance to confess their love and devotion to this goddess of technology?
Survey says: NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They go on and on and on and on about how it does this, does that, regardless of the facts from QVGA, or Dogmann (Marc), and Don't Ask. For the sake of embarassment, mods please close this thread and save these two Disney Land inhabitants from their continued thinking. Obviously they have to be hurthing themselves.
--
Posted: 2007-07-11 07:46:33
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
