News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > All about camdriver modding (for modders) Bookmark topic

overclock is to increase the MHZ, the front vga camera with the micron cam module runs 24MHZ by default look at the oringal 2.3 driver.

//=========================================================
//Power on sequence
//=========================================================

cam_power_on_2=5, 0, 0, 1, 0; // Set reset low
cam_power_on_0=5, 1, 26, 1, 0; // Set GPIO26 (CAMDIR)as output
cam_power_on_1=5, 2, 26, 0, 0; // Set GPIO26 (CAMDIR) as low (open bus to VGA camera)
cam_power_on_3=5, 1, 35, 1, 0; // Set GPIO35 (CAM27_EN) output
cam_power_on_4=5, 2, 35, 1, 0; // Set GPIO35 (CAM27_EN) as high (2.7 V on)
cam_power_on_5=5, 3, 4, 5dc0, 64; // Enable 24 MHz APLL clock wait 100 ms
cam_power_on_6=5, 0, 0, 0, 5; // Set reset high; wait for 5 ms


//=========================================================
//Power off sequence
//=========================================================

cam_power_off_0=5, 3, 4, 1, 0; // Disable clock and set low
cam_power_off_1=5, 0, 0, 1, 0; // Set reset low
cam_power_off_2=5, 1, 35, 1, 0; // Set GPIO35 (CAM27_EN) as output
cam_power_off_3=5, 2, 35, 0, 0; // Set GPIO35 (CAM27_EN) as low (2.7 V Off)
cam_power_off_4=5, 1, 26, 1, 0; // Set GPIO26 (CAMDIR) as output
cam_power_off_5=5, 2, 26, 1, 5; // Set GPIO26 (CAMDIR) as high (close bus to VGA camera); wait for 5 ms


cam_i2c_address=5d;

cam_vf_clock_freq=4, 5dc0; 24MHZ
cam_ss_clock_freq=4, 5dc0; 24MHZ
cam_init_result=;

cam_ss_format=B100;
cam_vf_format=B100;

could the MHZ be increased further or is 24MHZ the limit?????
--
Posted: 2008-02-29 18:28:01
Edit : Quote


[quote]
On 2008-02-29 18:28:01, number1 wrote:
overclock is to increase the MHZ, the front vga camera with the micron cam module runs 24MHZ by default look at the oringal 2.3 driver.

cam_power_on_5=5, 3, 4, 5dc0, 64; // Enable 24 MHz APLL clock wait 100 ms

cam_vf_clock_freq=[4], 5dc0; 24MHZ=>*div Table Block Diagram
cam_ss_clock_freq=[4], 5dc0; 24MHZ=>*div Table Block Diagram

*Divided the frequency


cam_init_result=;

cam_ss_format=B100;
cam_vf_format=B100;

could the MHZ be increased further or is 24MHZ the limit?????


@Number1

Do you read the comments, information or posts from other modders?
I don´t think so

For mobile phones overclock is not only increase the frequency, but by the hardware at risk to changes in voltage and other things
Not number1 the limit to work with 30fps recording of video in a camera of sony with these sensors is 27mhz this to these models of chip-sensor.Have models that support up to 48mhz in the two frequencies synchronized as the model k510.

Each model has its master clock


Micron-MT9... series


sensor block



You can sustain its ideas number1 but not everyone agrees with his view
Again everyone is to help, not to prove anything to nobody number1
Continue with your work and good job!


[ This Message was edited by: brazuka on 2008-02-29 19:34 ]
--
Posted: 2008-02-29 20:11:51
Edit : Quote


sadeghi85
yep, but they have old 2MP DSP architecture 7xx. 3MP is 8xx and any changes to cmd05 have no effects

number1


sweet marketing. there is a reality, thin line and then illusion where your brain plays tricks. outdoor reality is much better balanced than false (artificial lights) indoors. if WB doesn't work as 'turned off' in indoors then in outdoors situation is this same. as for me there is no differences

_________________
K800 R1KG001 (camdriver 6.1)
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-02-29 19:41 ]
--
Posted: 2008-02-29 20:25:55
Edit : Quote




sweet marketing, why would i market a free camdriver i'm not making money off it lol, i do notice improvements in outdoor pictures in colour & clearness indoors there isn't really much difference.
see the comparasion between the k800i & k770
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=164926&start=0
notice the k770 pics colours are correct and no mist effect like the k800i,
i get the same results in colours with my k800i by turning the whitebalance off not the same quality as the k770 but pictures are slighty clearer without the mist ,the k800 still has it's awful post-processing.


[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-02-29 20:03 ]
--
Posted: 2008-02-29 21:03:03
Edit : Quote


why should i pay attention on comparision between 2 cameras with different sensors each from other vendor? once again you used "whitebalance off" - do you want more pictures from 2.99 which show you that auto WB is working fine and it's not off?

code: set WB value 0x80 for auto
interpreter: let it be
camera: what the hell?! 0x80? i don't know this! i will use auto mode instead

ok, maybe small explanation. i'm software engineer, testing procedures are huge part of my work. there are no 'slightly', 'probably', 'maybe' - everything must be checked, verified and explained
--
Posted: 2008-02-29 22:26:24
Edit : Quote


Please guys stop...Disabling WB is a stupidity itself. JPEG compression mods too.

One question: What does mean the values #COM_EVENT(11,05) (one push) and #COM_EVENT(11,06) (hold) ?
--
Posted: 2008-02-29 23:19:46
Edit : Quote


OK one push=shade, but if we set it to 'hold', first it applies Auto WB and then holds it? Or simply holds the previous setting?
--
Posted: 2008-02-29 23:40:03
Edit : Quote


'hold' will just lock your current WB settings. for 99.99% of users WB lock is useless, especially in camphone. it is very useful if you want to play with gray card as white balance reference and then hold settings. another trick from advanced photography

_________________
K800 R1KG001 (camdriver 6.1)
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-02-29 22:56 ]
--
Posted: 2008-02-29 23:55:48
Edit : Quote


Hi all, what does AE_MSHUT_LONG mean? Thanks..
--
Posted: 2008-03-01 08:35:52
Edit : Quote


it's value corresponding to maximum exposure time of snapshot with used flash
--
Posted: 2008-03-01 13:36:12
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index