>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> so who is religous here?
Bookmark topic
oh ok, i know this may be a silly question but does it hurt when the cut the tackle off? dont it bleed like hell and what do they use? scalple? sissors?
--
Posted: 2005-09-29 01:39:32
Edit :
Quote
it's usually done when you are born or at a very early age.
It doesn't hurt because of the injections now (but I imagine it did hurt way back when)
It does bleed but not so much because the foreskin doesn't have so much blood rushing to it.
Or at least I think so.
@solid,
confused are we? He wasn't stating an opinion he was asking a question. An opinion is based on the truth not on a lie.
--
Posted: 2005-09-29 03:12:53
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-09-29 01:39:32, jagger2k wrote:
oh ok, i know this may be a silly question but does it hurt when the cut the tackle off? dont it bleed like hell and what do they use? scalple? sissors?
A hindu doctor did my kids 2 weeks ago, no blood and it was so easily done. special tools were used with injections and some medication. child has fully recovered and tickle tackle is in perfect working order
--
Posted: 2005-09-29 13:56:25
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-09-29 00:12:56, amnesia wrote:
thats such a messed up opinion.
Quote:
On 2005-09-29 00:16:18, solidsingh wrote:
everyone has different opinions
im not confused amnesia. are you?
--
Posted: 2005-09-29 14:31:18
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-09-29 14:31:18, solidsingh wrote:
Quote:
On 2005-09-29 00:12:56, amnesia wrote:
thats such a messed up opinion.
Quote:
On 2005-09-29 00:16:18, solidsingh wrote:
everyone has different opinions
im not confused amnesia. are you?
am confused.......about my sexuallity, lol not really!! am all straight. the the thing about being circumcised is the child does not even have a choice.
_________________
If anybody wants to swap a psp game for Tony Hawks Underground 2:remix PM me.
[ This Message was edited by: jagger2k on 2005-09-29 14:01 ]
--
Posted: 2005-09-29 15:00:06
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-09-29 14:31:18, solidsingh wrote:
Quote:
On 2005-09-29 00:12:56, amnesia wrote:
thats such a messed up opinion.
Quote:
On 2005-09-29 00:16:18, solidsingh wrote:
everyone has different opinions
im not confused amnesia. are you?
...
I'm not are you?
--
Posted: 2005-09-29 15:31:45
Edit :
Quote
Om shaanti om.......
This message was posted from a Nokia
--
Posted: 2005-09-29 16:36:34
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2005-09-28 19:28:33, amnesia wrote:
@vanquish, wasn't there a whole issue of how the Church of England blatantly said that being Gay was unacceptable?
Oh yes, peterkay, you find that funny.
If you had any idea of the church of england, you would find that priests and funny clothes and insence was not in the Bible in Acts, the beginning of the church. Therefore, they make alot of crap up. Whilst they may be christians, and may go to heaven, theyre views can sometimes be quite forthright.
And when did they say that? Theyre thinking about allowing gay priests! Oh yes ... unnacceptable
Get your facts straight
--
Posted: 2005-10-01 16:49:00
Edit :
Quote
As far as I understand it the Church of England is relatively progressive when it comes to accepting homosexuality, certainly when one compares it with the Roman Catholic Church. The Catholic Church doesn't allow women priests nor does it have any sort of measure of acceptance for homosexual priests. The Church of England on the other hand does, I believe there is a gay bishop in fact.
The Anglican Church in America (Anglican being the Church of England as far as I am aware) also has a gay bishop, whether he still is or not I'm not sure.
--
Posted: 2005-10-01 17:52:49
Edit :
Quote
get my facts straight? I didn't mention any facts vanquish lol.....
I just asked whether or not there was an issue with homosexuality. And there was!
--
Posted: 2005-10-01 21:17:48
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
